SAI360 vs. Whisperly

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
SAI360
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
SAI360 merges GRC software and Ethics & Compliance Learning to enhance risk management. Its scalable solutions have supported global organizations for 25+ years.N/A
Whisperly
Score 0.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Whisperly is a compliance platform featuring autonomous agents to handle the boring work, so privacy, compliance, risk, and security teams can focus on strategic questions instead of administration. Whisperly centralizes governance, risk, and compliance operations across GDPR, UK GDPR, CCPA, ISO 42001, and the EU AI Act. Its AI agents are designed to automate the operational grind, Records of Processing Activities (RoPA), DPIAs, policy generation, vendor risk…N/A
Pricing
SAI360Whisperly
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SAI360Whisperly
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsWhisperly is priced per usage volume and tokens consumed. Whisperly does not charge organizations per user or seat.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SAI360Whisperly
Considered Both Products
SAI360
Chose SAI360
Archer was very similar to SAI360 in cost and features. Has a more modern look and feel and more task functionality. The price point was very similar. Didn't choose them as our existing usage is in an On-Prem version and support from our in-house IT team was not able to be …
Chose SAI360
Also evaluated, and implemented SAP GRC Process control for Continuous Control Monitoring in SAP. Initially selected BWise for cost and flexibility.
Chose SAI360
Wasn't personally involved in the vendor selection process. I am aware that one of the main drivers for selecting BWise was cost (I believe BWise total project cost was several times lower than MetricStream's).
Whisperly

No answer on this topic

Features
SAI360Whisperly
Governance, Risk & Compliance
Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of Product A and Product B
SAI360
7.7
Ratings
4% above category average
Whisperly
-
Ratings
Common repository of GRC items9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk management7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
GRC policy management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Incident management7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
SAI360Whisperly
Small Businesses
Egnyte
Egnyte
Score 9.3 out of 10
Egnyte
Egnyte
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.2 out of 10
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.2 out of 10
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SAI360Whisperly
Likelihood to Recommend
7.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
SAI360Whisperly
Likelihood to Recommend
The usage of ROAM, as well as the integration of external programmes through API and import functions, has almost reduced duplication of work. One thing to keep in mind is that your use cases must be very clear. There are a lot of SAI solutions, and their titles don't always correspond to what they actually perform.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Customized unified design platform
  • Modules that fit your organization
  • Low technology involvement with information department.
  • Built on foundational platforms some bidirectional in the ERM framework with TPRM contracts
  • Single sign-on web-based applications
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Internal Quality Check. I think this is the most prominent area BWise should improve on. Currently they lack internal Quality Check/Review.
  • Internal dialogue among employees. When various consultants are involved in the same project, their communication and updating each-other could be a bit stronger.
  • Inclusion of content. The application could benefit considerably from including some out-of-the-box content (e.g. COSO principles, Risk catalogs, etc.).
  • Risk Workshop functionality. This is one of the main functionalities that allows integration among different areas of an organization. However, it comes pretty much "take it or leave it"; it's almost not customizable.
  • Consultants' transparency. When an organization requests a particular design of the application or solicits changes to such design, it would be great if BWise consultants could always and more thoroughly advise on the implications of these changes, design to the organization's strategic objectives and ultimate target.
  • Product features. Application has room for improving its programming, e.g. providing internal checks when creating/answering an issue/finding (for instance, remedy implementation date cannot be before the recommendation response date or the recommendation creation date). Another example would be the possibility of automatic periodic followup (e.g. every 1 month until completion).
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
BWIse is very flexible, and an affordable GRC tool.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Overall it is a very versatile system that does help to keep our processes automated and secure. We are able to streamline our day to day activities.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
BWise support is knowledgeable and responsive. Bug fixes and development are also timely and ongoing.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
The main issues were managing the internal conflicts and competing objectives, rather than the capability and implementation of BWise itself.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Wasn't personally involved in the vendor selection process. I am aware that one of the main drivers for selecting BWise was cost (I believe BWise total project cost was several times lower than MetricStream's).
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • The system is costly for the initial setup
  • Does help to mitigate risk and keep the vendors and internal departments from becoming non-compliant.
  • One license for all users
  • Easy to manage employee's security access
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Whisperly Screenshots

Screenshot of Organisation-wide AI risk posture across every system: inheritance, treatment coverage and residual exposure.Screenshot of where to manage Request for Proposal (RFP) responses.Screenshot of The RoPA Controller page, which lists all processing records where the organization acts as the controller. Users can view, edit, and create new entries using the table and New button. For more information, see the Information section on the right-hand sidebar.Screenshot of where to manage custom vendor assessment forms for evaluating vendors and their data processing practices. This page is used to track vendor assessments and their risk levels.Screenshot of the central repository for RFP knowledge, templates, and reference documents.Screenshot of the task management dashboard, where viewers can filter by priority, search by name, and switch between list and kanban views.