TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

SAP Process Control vs. Secureframe

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    SAP Process Control

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/ASAP Process Control Simplifies uses continuous control monitoring, and streamlined testing, and reduces risk with real-time insight into control status and key issues. It can be deployed on premise or in the cloud.N/A

    Secureframe

    Score9.2 out of 10
    N/ASecureframe, headquartered in San Francisco, helps companies get enterprise ready by streamlining SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA compliance. Secureframe aims to enable companies to get compliant within weeks, rather than months and monitors 40+ services, including AWS, GCP, and Azur.N/A
    Pricing
    SAP Process ControlSecureframe
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    SAP Process ControlSecureframe
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    SAP Process ControlSecureframe
    Governance, Risk & Compliance
    Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of SAP Process Control and Secureframe
    Feature
    SAP Process Control
    7.0
    3 Ratings
    6% below category average
    Secureframe
    -
    Ratings
    Common repository of GRC items9.83 Ratings00 Ratings
    Risk management6.13 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    GRC policy management7.83 Ratings00 Ratings
    Incident management6.12 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Ratings
    SAP Process ControlSecureframe
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.9
    (3 ratings)
    9.2
    (5 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.6
    (5 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    SAP Process ControlSecureframe
    Likelihood to Recommend
    SAP
    In my opinion, SAP Process Control is well suited for bigger companies with an already mature Internal Control System as well as for bigger companies who want to completely new/redesign the internal control system. The size of the company, as well as the budget, is quite important when thinking about the implementation of SAP Process Control. A smaller company with e.g., 150 people should think more about implementing SAP FCM.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Secureframe
    As an early-stage startup venturing into SOC 2 for the first time with no in-house compliance expertise, I'd say Secureframe is well-suited for early startups. They walked us through various parts of the process and recommended how to approach certain configurations and controls appropriate for our situation and size. We can easily see Secureframe working for larger companies as well; they seem to have a solid foundation in place.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    SAP
    • Native connection to SAP applications
    • Automated monitoring process of SAP applications
    • Workflow capabilities for control testing
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Secureframe
    • Centralizes compliance work.
    • Controls sensitive document sharing.
    • Creates accountability and audit trails.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    SAP
    • Default delivery of controls could be done by SAP on some basic controls like client openings, password controls, etc
    • The messaging or customization of messages in different workflows is limited, which could be introduced to enhance the product
    • SAP Process control does not have the capability for cloud product monitoring which is required with more SAP cloud products available right now
    Read full review
    Secureframe
    • The new audit module had a few minor bugs during setup on our 2nd pass, but nothing that broke. Confident it'll smooth out the longer it's live in Prod.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Secureframe
    The Questionnaires feature (which assists in RFP's, security questionnaires, etc) could be designed a lot better. I see what they were going for, and based on their track record for improving features I'm sure it will get a refresh, but in it's current state it is the only features that I do not use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    SAP
    The connectivity with other SAP products out of the SAP GRC suite, like Access Control and so on, was key for the decision. Also we had an already mature SAP System landscape as well as having internal processes that were similar to the SAP Process Control standard processes helped us with the decision to implement SAP Process Control.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Secureframe
    From purely comparing marketing sites (unable to trial others), Secureframe had better first time SOC 2 audit documentation and explanations for free to ease you into understanding the processes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    SAP
    • Automated alerts for controls issues
    • Workflow capabilities; however, there's natively only 2 levels of review. More layers would be beneficial.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Secureframe
    • It is easier and quicker to provide customers access to sensitive materials.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots