SAP Process Control vs. Secureframe

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
SAP Process Control
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
SAP Process Control Simplifies uses continuous control monitoring, and streamlined testing, and reduces risk with real-time insight into control status and key issues. It can be deployed on premise or in the cloud.N/A
Secureframe
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Secureframe, headquartered in San Francisco, helps companies get enterprise ready by streamlining SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA compliance. Secureframe aims to enable companies to get compliant within weeks, rather than months and monitors 40+ services, including AWS, GCP, and Azur.N/A
Pricing
SAP Process ControlSecureframe
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SAP Process ControlSecureframe
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SAP Process ControlSecureframe
Considered Both Products
SAP Process Control
Chose SAP Process Control
The connectivity with other SAP products out of the SAP GRC suite, like Access Control and so on, was key for the decision. Also we had an already mature SAP System landscape as well as having internal processes that were similar to the SAP Process Control standard processes …
Chose SAP Process Control
The strongest area is the native capability to connect to SAP applications to extract and analyze configuration and transactional data. AuditBoard and ServiceNow have better reporting/dashboard capabilities which offer better user experience. In addition, out of the box SAP …
Chose SAP Process Control
SAP Process Control is more integrated into SAP products which reduces customization, unlike other products like access violation management from greenlight. Other products like sailpoint are available in products to monitor similar functionality but are to be more customized …
Secureframe
Chose Secureframe
From purely comparing marketing sites (unable to trial others), Secureframe had better first time SOC 2 audit documentation and explanations for free to ease you into understanding the processes.
Chose Secureframe
Simplicity, ease of use, and responsiveness. The three most important things for me in any product/service. If use of the product comes naturally and I get the answers I need quickly you're already a contender for me. But, when I can get a response from my account manager in …
Features
SAP Process ControlSecureframe
Governance, Risk & Compliance
Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of Product A and Product B
SAP Process Control
7.0
Ratings
6% below category average
Secureframe
-
Ratings
Common repository of GRC items9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk management6.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
GRC policy management7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Incident management6.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
SAP Process ControlSecureframe
Small Businesses
Egnyte
Egnyte
Score 9.3 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.1 out of 10
Rapid7 InsightVM
Rapid7 InsightVM
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.1 out of 10
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SAP Process ControlSecureframe
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
SAP Process ControlSecureframe
Likelihood to Recommend
SAP Process Control is well suited for managing the end to end lifecycle of controls across different regulations. When managing a risk and controls framework it is better suited for public companies that have regulation requirements. The tool does not offer good capabilities for managing robust IT regulations. It would be good if there's improvement to the tool so it can be used to manage IT assets.
Read full review
Good typical compliance framework with easy interface and integrations to ensure standard compliances like SOC 2. I suspect for the base functionality, its very similar to other competitors like Vanta so really a preference.
Read full review
Pros
  • Workflows - The workflows of SAP Process Control are extremely helpful
  • Reporting - Standard reports as well as the connection to SAP AC is very helpful
  • Continuous Control Monitoring is the way to go in ICS Topics in the future.
  • Handling of users - Assignment and Replacements
  • Spot Checks - Helpful workflows and setup
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Integrated attachments functionality (i.e., edit Word/Excel documents within SAP PC, rather than having to download the files locally)
  • More flexible dashboarding capabilities
  • Better out of the box reporting
  • No out of the box content for Controls, Regulations
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
No answers on this topic
The Questionnaires feature (which assists in RFP's, security questionnaires, etc) could be designed a lot better. I see what they were going for, and based on their track record for improving features I'm sure it will get a refresh, but in it's current state it is the only features that I do not use.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
The connectivity with other SAP products out of the SAP GRC suite, like Access Control and so on, was key for the decision. Also we had an already mature SAP System landscape as well as having internal processes that were similar to the SAP Process Control standard processes helped us with the decision to implement SAP Process Control.
Read full review
Simplicity, ease of use, and responsiveness. The three most important things for me in any product/service. If use of the product comes naturally and I get the answers I need quickly you're already a contender for me. But, when I can get a response from my account manager in under 90 minutes, consistently. Then I know that my business matters to them.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Significant control on risks
  • Significant savings on audit testing can be achieved
  • Automation of risk management has a lot of audit standardization and confidence in compliance
  • Reliability of automated controls reduces time vested in testing the standard controls
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots