SentinelOne Singularity vs. Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

SentinelOne Singularity

Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
SentinelOne Singularity	Score 8.9 out of 10	N/A	SentinelOne is endpoint security software, from the company of the same name with offices in North America and Israel, presenting a combined antivirus and EDR solution.	$4 per agent, per month
Trellix Endpoint Security ENS	Score 8.2 out of 10	N/A	Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) solutions apply proactive threat intelligence and defenses across the entire attack lifecycle to keep organizations safer and more resilient.	N/A

Pricing

SentinelOne Singularity

Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

Editions & Modules

Singularity Ranger IoT: $4
per agent, per month
Singularity Core: $6
per agent, per month
Singularity Control: $8
per agent, per month
Singularity Complete: $12
per agent, per month
Singularity Cloud: $36
per VM/Kubernetes worker node, per month

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
SentinelOne Singularity	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	SentinelOne Singularity	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
Considered Both Products	SentinelOne Singularity Verified User Anonymous Chose SentinelOne Singularity SentinelOne Singularity is also a very good product.Crowdstrike is also a leading company in EDR point of view and provide wide range of services and product.But because of last incident happen crowdstrike customer are bit hesitate going with crowdstrike.And SentinelOne … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose SentinelOne Singularity Recommendation of an outside consultant. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose SentinelOne Singularity It’s very easy to deploy from our rmm and delivers fast responses to issues Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose SentinelOne Singularity Microsoft was cheaper, but way more difficult to get setup and deployed and to manage. VMWare carbon black got purchased by broadsoft, so I doged a bullet there. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose SentinelOne Singularity VMware Carbon Black EDR Incentivized Helpful? RA Rahul Aggarwal Security Engineer Chose SentinelOne Singularity Only reason for choosing SentinelOne Singularity over crowdstrike was the cost because SentinelOne Singularity was much cheaper at that time as compared to the crowdstrike. Also, SentinelOne Singularity rating in gartner was higher than the crowdstrike which also gave it an … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose SentinelOne Singularity SentinelOne Singularity is a far superior product to Symantec Endpoint Security, which is the product we migrated from, when we purchased SentinelOne. Symantec simply missed security incidents it should have been able to catch, and support has recently changed for the worse. … Incentivized Helpful? SU Seth Urbanczyk Network Administrator Chose SentinelOne Singularity In the distant past we had used iSensor through Dell. I can't say much about iSensor because we never really had it show any incidents or activity or reports. It might be better these days but from what I can tell, SentinelOne is the Gold Standard currently. Incentivized Helpful? RM Rob Morton President Chose SentinelOne Singularity There is no question, although they all have pro's and cons, SentinelOne is far superior Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose SentinelOne Singularity SentinelOne and Microsoft Defender are both best of industry EDR solutions. We employ both in out environment in tandem to provided complete coverage of systems and protection against all emerging cyber threats. Incentivized Helpful? EM Eric Milles Help Desk Manager Chose SentinelOne Singularity Webroot is a great product but did not provide the versatility that we really were desiring. It allowed to us to centrally manage, but required policy-based management, and not the endpoint detail we wanted. SentinelOne's central management provides a variety of options for … Incentivized Helpful? Nathan Venno Cyber Security Engineer Chose SentinelOne Singularity SentinelOne is definitely next-gen endpoint protection which makes it better than Symantec or Trend in that category. It prevents attacks and installs, allows you to monitor and update on the fly and works well overall. Also it is not as bulky as other products so you don't get … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose SentinelOne Singularity SentinelOne had all of the major features that we were looking for. The other products either required too much administrative attention or were lacking key features. For example, one could be uninstalled by the end user. We required that the installation be password … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose SentinelOne Singularity Compared to the competition there really is no comparison. While there are many far better known endpoint protection products that have been around many years longer, SentinelOne puts them all to shame. It is the most solid endpoint/anti-virus product that I have used in over … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose SentinelOne Singularity There are in my opinion products with the characteristics that can be [compared] to SentinelOne. Incentivized Helpful? Mark Patterson Chief Information Officer Chose SentinelOne Singularity SentinelOne has provided us better protection than other products we used in the past. We have also seen less impact on the system performance. Incentivized Helpful?	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Trellix Endpoint Security ENS interfaces better with other tools and is simpler to use. provides wider endpoint protection and more centralized control than SentinelOne's automatic response. Trellix Endpoint Security ENS preserves McAfee's dependability while offering newer … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS At the time we took the decision all other products seemed to be complicated in usage and licensing. Trellix was very simple in all the aspects: licensing, usage, support. It also was very simple to deploy, setup and manage. Product interface was simple to understand and even … Incentivized Helpful? JC Jensen Concepcion IT head Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS All in one protection for endpoint devices, the data loss prevention, and adaptive threat protection is the best advantage against other competitors. The cost for the platform and service is very effective and efficient. The usage and capability of this software is very edge … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Unlike Trellix Endpoint Security Symantec Endpoint provides less information about events on the user side. Trellix give an opportunity to see information about virus detection on a user machine as quick as it possible, so we were able to catch the signs of virus propagation … Incentivized Helpful? Junior Pierre-Toussaint Senior Information Technology Security Officer Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS i've evaluated a few different solution but from different needs Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS FireEye Endpoint Security is my favorite EDR tool. It's a single pane of glass that fits nicely into the Helix and NX platforms. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS It has fewer false positive issues. It also provides more compatibility with a variety of different OS versions. The sensor installation is easy to use, update and maintain as well as the reporting capabilities that it can offer are more robust than the ones that other … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Compared to its competitors like Cisco, McAfee is cheaper. At the competitive pricing levels, McAfee Endpoint Security does a good job. Although it stacks up finely against decent priced solutions but it doesn't provide superior service if the price limit is scaled down or up. … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Compared to Endgame and AMP, McAfee Endpoint Security doesn't hold a candle to them when it comes to detecting/advanced identifying malware or zero days. Since Mcafee Endpoint Security is signature-based, it is way behind the curve with newer anti-malware tools that can focus … Incentivized Helpful? TP Tanish Pruthi Marketing Associate Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS We were using Microsoft Defender in the beginning as it was free and quite good. But as we got acquired by a large MNC, we were asked to switch to McAfee as we had to follow the company guidelines which takes data security very seriously and personally. I think the switch did … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS The solution is already in place when I join the organization. I do not have any information on what other antivirus software they evaluated before decided to purchase McAfee Endpoint Security. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS McAfee is a strong, if not strongest A/V solution in the endpoint security space. It's wide adoption and strong support and positive reviews from companies like Gartner and Forrester back it up. Incentivized Helpful? Ralf Richter Senior Solution Architect Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS If you have Cisco tools and equipment globally in place and just for the clients additionally McAfee you should have a deeper look. We wanted to install end-2-end security over all networks and hardware. This was a big point for Cisco. For a managed client team, Cisco is a step … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS McAfee Endpoint Security has a better GUI, better pricing, stronger features, and agent deployment is much faster. Their firewall is extremely good, and for those reasons I would firmly recommend it over other solutions (Kaspersky, Symantec etc). Like I mentioned earlier, do … Incentivized Helpful? Dharma raju DevOps Engineer/Linux Admin Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS McAfee Endpoint Security provides a single platform for Firewall, AV and web control. With the new console and integration between the components, threat detection is superior. Incentivized Helpful? Tom Parker Remote Facilities Systems Support Analyst Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Trend Micro is a better solution in our environment. It is easier to manage and seems to do a better job. Incentivized Helpful? Christopher "Scott" Pandolfo Security Specialist Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS McAfee is a cheaper price point, however Kaspersky out performs McAfee in every category. We went with McAfee, because many of the team members in IT were familar with it, less training (short term), and lower cost (short term) Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Advanced Threat Protection, or ATP in Office 365 was awful. Some attachments wouldn't be delivered at all while others took minutes and sometimes hours to be delivered after being scanned. It was causing us to lose business. FireEye processes attachments in less than 60 seconds … Incentivized Helpful? Roberta Jones IT Administrative Specialist Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS We only selected McAfee because we are already using ESET NOD32 for the protection of our desktops and laptops. We didn't want to use the same software for our servers so we chose McAfee instead. I personally like ESET Smart Security better than McAfee when deploying it on a … Incentivized Helpful?

Features

SentinelOne Singularity

Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

Endpoint Security

Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
	SentinelOne Singularity 9.2 Ratings 8% above category average	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS 8.3 Ratings 3% below category average
Anti-Exploit Technology	9.50 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)	9.90 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Centralized Management	8.90 Ratings	9.00 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support	8.50 Ratings	7.90 Ratings
Infection Remediation	9.80 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management	7.80 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Malware Detection	9.80 Ratings	9.00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	SentinelOne Singularity	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
Small Businesses	ThreatLocker Score 9.1 out of 10	ThreatLocker Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.0 out of 10	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises	BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Score 10.0 out of 10	BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Score 10.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	SentinelOne Singularity	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
Likelihood to Recommend	9.5 (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Usability	8.6 (0 ratings)	8.0 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	9.2 (0 ratings)	5.0 (0 ratings)
Ease of integration	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	SentinelOne Singularity	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
Likelihood to Recommend	It works extremely well for investigating the root cause analysis of events because you can see so much detail into what was happening before, after, and around the detective incident. A weak point would be when the AI gets a little over-aggressive or doesn’t quite understand the use case for specific tools. Our RMM tool was detected as a pup. Verified User Anonymous Read full review	During the pandemic all our users worked remotely that was challenging from security perspective, so we had to deploy the endpoint protection system with cloud based monitoring server. By doing that we were able to keep safety for users workspaces even though some of them did not connect to VPN for a long time Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	SentinelOne provides excellent protection against known and unknown attacks to our endpoints. The recovery option provides a fast, first line of defense against ransomware and other system damaging attacks. SentinelOne requires minimal administrative support making it a very cost effective and efficient solution. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Provides high fidelity alerting. Allows CSOC analysts to perform forensic triage and alert investigations through containment from a single pane of glass. Provides alert telemetry across on-disk and in-memory attacks. Supports many additional 'bolt-on' modules to provide additional alert context or capabilities. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Possibly for compatibility with legacy Windows OS's and non Windows OS's. Some settings are greyed out and unable to change but I believe this is to protect you from making a bad configuration change. Could do better with reporting at the base level subscription. Incentivized SU Seth Urbanczyk Network Administrator Read full review	My biggest flak with McAfee Endpoint Security is that it is quite resource-intensive. It does tend to make the system a little slow. You get security at the expense of your machine's speed. Even though the drive encryption makes the system more secure, it takes a lot of time to first enter the very long password, and then for it to decrypt the whole machine. This sometimes clashes with Windows update and causes a lot of complications which leads to boot loops. Incentivized TP Tanish Pruthi Marketing Associate Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	Reliable for simple installation and above all efficient Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Usability	There are some minor issues with the platform that can be mildly frustrating, but the overall performance, peace of mind, and ROI make it worth using. The management console is intuitive and easy to learn, the endpoint clients are simple but give IT professionals enough data to make management easy and simple Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	So below is my breakdown, Pro's: Centralized Management, Comprehensive Protection and customization. Con's: Initial cost Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	Their support is good and quick to respond. The one issue we faced was when a non-protection issue arose there was a lot of dancing around trying to figure things out. This was frustrating as it took significantly longer to figure out issues. Lots of repetitive log gathers, screen caps, uninstalls that never seemed to resolve issues. Eventually, the product would be updated and the issue seemed to be resolved, but seemed to be the only solution. Incentivized Nathan Venno Cyber Security Engineer Read full review	The support is pretty good, and I haven't had any issues with getting the highest quality technical support when there are issues. Tech support representatives that I have dealt with know the product quite well and have solved many issues that I have had with the product in the past. The only issue I have with support is that it can be quite expensive. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	In the distant past we had used iSensor through Dell. I can't say much about iSensor because we never really had it show any incidents or activity or reports. It might be better these days but from what I can tell, SentinelOne is the Gold Standard currently. Incentivized SU Seth Urbanczyk Network Administrator Read full review	We only selected McAfee because we are already using ESET NOD32 for the protection of our desktops and laptops. We didn't want to use the same software for our servers so we chose McAfee instead. I personally like ESET Smart Security better than McAfee when deploying it on a desktop or laptop because I think it protects the PC better. When it comes to web protection, policy updates, etc., McAfee is the better choice and that's why we deployed it on our servers. Incentivized Roberta Jones IT Administrative Specialist Read full review
Return on Investment	SentinelOne has already proved its value by stopping attacks that would have gone otherwise unnoticed until much later in their infection process. The Vigilance team has provided quick response to threats that were not easily contained via the automated response SentinelOne's agents provide. This has given us a significant piece of mind. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	This tool helped us in delegating the asset safety responsibility to the client level by 80%, leaving 20% for the management console. With a decent pricing, the benefits are slightly above expectations. The ROI is good. But, considering most of the malware comes from internet, with a good email security appliance and next gen firewall in place, the online security alerts are now redundant. It could be something that can be termed as overkill on the budget. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	SentinelOne Singularity Screenshots	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Screenshots