Sherpany is a meeting management software designed for leaders and administrators. This software fosters paperless meetings, drives the focus on decision-making and strives to turn meetings into true value creators for large and midsize enterprises. Built-in close collaboration with executives, directors, and corporate secretaries, Sherpany aims to ensure an impeccable user experience throughout the entire meeting process. Compliant with EU…
N/A
Spike
Score4 out of 10
N/A
Spike, from the company of the same name in Herzelia, bring communication -- emails, chats, calls, team collaborations, tasks, voice notes -- to one place. presented as a productivity and messaging app, but easier, from an inbox.
$4
per month billed annually per member
Pricing
Sherpany
Spike
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starter
$0
Teamspace - Team
$4
per month billed annually per member
Teamspace - Team
$5
per month per member
Email App - Pro
$5
per month billed annually per member
Teamspace - Business
$8
per month billed annually per member
Email App - Pro
$8
per month per member
Teamspace - Business
$10
per month per member
Email App - Ultimate
$10
per month billed annually per member
Email App - Ultimate
$16
per month per member
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Sherpany
Spike
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Sherpany
Spike
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Sherpany and Spike
Feature
Sherpany
-
Ratings
Spike
8.9
3 Ratings
14% above category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
9.52 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
7.63 Ratings
Search
00 Ratings
8.63 Ratings
Visual planning tools
00 Ratings
9.52 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Sherpany and Spike
Feature
Sherpany
-
Ratings
Spike
8.5
3 Ratings
7% above category average
Chat
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Notifications
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Discussions
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Surveys
00 Ratings
7.52 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
00 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting
00 Ratings
6.52 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts
00 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook
00 Ratings
8.73 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Sherpany and Spike
Sherpany helps us to retrieve information from previous meetings quickly. Participants for conferences can be contacted and their records can be viewed every time, wherever, and whether they are provided by the data they collect.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Spike makes it simple to remain in touch with your peers and teams. It is simple, and searching for team members in the search tab is quick. Moreover, this tool makes screen sharing easier for presentations. The software is incredibly user-friendly and simple to use. Spike's versatility is enhanced via instant texting through this app. The visual and audio call quality is outstanding. Except for cloud storage, Spike does not connect with other applications. While there is a solid rationale for this, since everything - calendar, notes, tasks, team communication - can be made in the app, it loses some value if you prefer, for example, Microsoft To-Do and OneNote or Google Projects and Keep to organize your tasks and notes. I'd like to see a less costly email, calendar, and contacts-only subscription for solitary users.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Changes with new versions should be well communicated in advance and consider in more detail the impact on existing boardrooms
Too expensive
Generally, more possibilities for customizing e.g. it should be possible to define security levels for access individually (why do I have to retype my email every time I synchronize?) or it should be up to the users whether and how they want to use labels (why can I only have one label per document?)
I wish the calendar was more robust and provided a comprehensive look. I'd also want to have multiple windows open.
The inability to sync settings across devices. Configuring several devices with the same settings takes effort, particularly when it comes to custom IMAP.
Email Signature in HTML is still not taught as the capability, which I'd love to see.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Much easier to annotate documents, better User Interface which makes it very easy to access material discussed in earlier Meetings; also very easy to navigate between different topics on the agenda.
The first one to use after google calendar is spike, after all the features that I've already mentioned,like the possibility to send a voice message, videos,photos etc... And the possibility to chat in real time and a good organization and planification and the priority feature is my favorite
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The only negative thing I can see is that members can be victims of technostress and sometimes forget their password, how to find a document in a session. My role is to help them, reassure them and find a solution with them
The positive is that all our members are often members of several committees at once and instead of receiving folders with a ton of documents, which are often cumbersome and heavy, everything is on the IPads. They can also annotate their documents as they want.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info