Short.io vs. TinyURL

Short.cm is best suited where you need to type something with a character limit and you can't afford to add long links. Instead, you can shorten the link using Short.cm and paste it into the messaging app. Example: Twitter has a character limit for tweets. Short.cm is less appropriate for apps like Gmail, Slack, etc that have an inbuilt hyperlinking mechanism making Short.cm's usage is very minimal. (My personal experience).

Incentivized

Since Tiny URL is able to be customized to a certain extent, we are able to take a long link to our website or landing page and create a much shorter version to add into social and digital campaigns where characters are limited and space is needed analytically and visually

Incentivized

• Link Shortening.
• UTM Tracking.
• Link Organizing.

Incentivized

• Shortest link possible
• Lets you still customize the link/message
• Links don't expire

Incentivized

• I would like to be able to hover over the short URL to show the original URL when the original is too big.

Incentivized

• Access to analytics would be great
• Creating a login for a business account
• availability to redirect link if needed

Incentivized

Short.io is much more versatile compared to Bitly, in addition to having the option to change the language to Spanish, Short.io has better accessibility, and more options to provide people looking for a page that provides them with information as vital as the clicks on the links, being the strongest reason to choose short that has Spanish language and is easier to use.

Incentivized

• Increased click conversion (for links in sms) by 6%.
• Helps us stay within character limits for sms and avoid filtering by carrier.
• Increased website traffic (from new users responding to mail solicitations) by around 10%.

Incentivized

• can reach in different ways where long url cannot
• ability to use on social without clogging space
• easier to use, easier to spend

Incentivized