Zephyr Scale vs. Tuskr

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Zephyr Scale
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
TM4j is a test management application for Jira, developed by Jira solutions specialist Adaptavist, acquired and now supported by SmartBear since March 2020.
$4.55
per month per user
Tuskr
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
Tuskr is a cloud-based test management software. Users can manage test cases, conduct test runs and integrate with bug and time tracking tools. Tuskr is available via a free plan, and with a 30-day free trial of paid tier features.
$45
per month 5 users (minimum)
Pricing
Zephyr ScaleTuskr
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Team
$9
per month per user
Business
$15
per month per user
Enterprise
$29
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Zephyr ScaleTuskr
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsFree up to 10 users, $4.55/user/month after that. It gets cheaper as you scale.16% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Zephyr ScaleTuskr
Features
Zephyr ScaleTuskr
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
Zephyr Scale
7.8
1 Ratings
4% below category average
Tuskr
9.9
24 Ratings
20% above category average
Centralized test management8.01 Ratings9.923 Ratings
Map tests to user stories8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Test execution reporting8.01 Ratings9.924 Ratings
Defect management7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Zephyr ScaleTuskr
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.9 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.9 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Zephyr ScaleTuskr
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(25 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.2
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
Zephyr ScaleTuskr
Likelihood to Recommend
SmartBear
Jira and Confluence are widely implemented in organizations of various industries so incorporating Zephyr Scale is a very seamless method of adding scalable testing management. Testing visibility and end to end traceability is possible and integrates in Jira. Developers and engineers are able to take advantage of the built-in reports and statistics and even automate testing. The value is greatly reduced for organizations that do not already implement Jira and Confluence as the native integrated compatibility is much of the value
Read full review
Celoxis
Its interface, features and dashboard which help a lot to streamline the workflow. And its really very ease to use. My team and I just use this software and adapt in a week. I surely recommend to any organisation, in regards of pricing, features and interface. And their customer support.
Read full review
Pros
SmartBear
  • Scalable and compatible with Jira & Confluence
  • Improves testing visibility, data analysis, collaboration with reports & gadgets
  • Easy to retrospectively trace testing with change history
Read full review
Celoxis
  • Its easy to import test cases in Tuskr by using the csv import feature
  • Test runs are easy to create and can include test cases from multiple suits.
  • Reports of test runs make it easier to track all the cases that were covered at a particular instance before giving a release signoff.
Read full review
Cons
SmartBear
  • Not as valuable if not already using Jira or Confluence
  • Can be overlooked if the user does not set automation
  • Needs better first time tutorials
Read full review
Celoxis
  • When you click into a specific test, the status automatically clears. it would be nice for this to be preserved when clicking in instead of clearing
  • It would be nice to be able to add comments specific to certain steps in each test, instead of just one big comment box
  • Since we use Tuskr for QA, we structure it as a table with instructions and expected results. because these are side by side, sometimes it is hard to go in a step-by-step order when there are multiple QA steps to take to complete the test.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Celoxis
Tuskr suits our organization needs
Read full review
Usability
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Celoxis
The test case management and automating repetitive tasks, Tuskr saves significant time for my QA teams. The whole process was very easy for my team to adapt and get comfortable with other software. We were continuously able to improve our business and this had a significant positive impact on customer satisfaction and retention.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
SmartBear
Zephyr scale is easier to work with and more seamlessly used because it is natively integrated with Jira and Confluence. TestRail cannot provide the same scalable experience and is rather dated and limited in capability. Developers rather use tools that are compatible with each other, and Zephyr scale offers that
Read full review
Celoxis
I have not worked with related testing suite before but Tuskr has been the favorite platform for running test suites. It has generated positive leads from the company data by offering the necessary testing support. It is easy to integrate with other applications to suit business demands. The system generate results from various testing suites that can shared with our clients.
Read full review
Return on Investment
SmartBear
  • Dozens of added testing capability via integrated gadgets
  • Reduced testing and tracking time
  • Faster and clearer testing operations awareness
Read full review
Celoxis
  • Everyone in the team can go and read how to perform a specific test and note down the result of it which can be viewed by anyone
  • We can filter based on results understanding what test cases are failing from previous runs
  • Helps save a lot of time, effort and minimises future issues
Read full review
ScreenShots

Tuskr Screenshots

Screenshot of Progress MonitoringScreenshot of Create Flexible test casesScreenshot of Distribute Workload