SonicWall Secure Mobile Access (SMA) vs. WireGuard

SonicWall Secure Mobile Access (SMA) is well suited as a solution for VPN on your phone. It allows our agency's employees to access our data and system from almost any device at any time. SonicWall Secure Mobile Access (SMA) is less appropriate if you need to implement the product in a very short time frame, as it took longer than expected for rollout to staff.

Incentivized

Perfect for low spec hardware, it runs perfectly well.

Incentivized

• Secure remote access
• Control what access users can have
• Protect from harmful sites and downloads

Incentivized

• Perfomance
• Security
• Ease of use
• Reliability

Incentivized

• SMA is limited to only SSL VPN , it should have support for hybrid VPN (SSL + IPSEC)
• There are different specs and features for Enterprise and SMB. Features should be same for all devices.
• It does not have URL filtering, content filtering, AV/IPS and Threat Prevention features. For achieving the same, we need to deploy another product like firewall or proxy.

Incentivized

• Some kind of access control, although I know this is out of scope of the tool

Incentivized

Both Citrix Gateway and Sonic Secure Mobile Access are great for providing your workers with the ability to work remotely during the pandemic to access their office network. Both have secure networks and are stable systems to use. They both perform well for employees and provide helpful customer tech support when needed.

Incentivized

OpenVPN its a well known solution but it pales compared to WireGuard in terms of perfomance, speed and easey implementation.

Also it required less resources.

Incentivized

• Security incidents went down by about 30%.
• With the new world of hybrid work, this SMA functions well and is a necessity.
• We've had a few issues with patches breaking functions.

Incentivized

• Reliability
• Resilience
• Peace of mind

Incentivized