SQL Server Integration Services vs. Striim

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
SSIS
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS) is a data integration solution.N/A
Striim
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Striim is an enterprise-grade platform that offers continuous real-time data ingestion, high-speed in-flight stream processing, and sub-second delivery of data to cloud and on-premises endpoints.
$4,400
per month per 100 million Striim events
Pricing
SQL Server Integration ServicesStriim
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Striim Cloud Enterprise Platform
$4,400
per month per 100 million Striim events
Striim Platform
$20,000
per year per VCPU
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SSISStriim
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SQL Server Integration ServicesStriim
Features
SQL Server Integration ServicesStriim
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Product A and Product B
SQL Server Integration Services
6.0
54 Ratings
31% below category average
Striim
10.0
2 Ratings
20% above category average
Connect to traditional data sources8.054 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL4.041 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Product A and Product B
SQL Server Integration Services
7.0
54 Ratings
14% below category average
Striim
8.9
2 Ratings
10% above category average
Simple transformations10.054 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Complex transformations4.053 Ratings7.82 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
SQL Server Integration Services
7.0
52 Ratings
11% below category average
Striim
8.5
2 Ratings
8% above category average
Data model creation8.627 Ratings8.42 Ratings
Metadata management7.133 Ratings8.42 Ratings
Business rules and workflow5.043 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Collaboration8.039 Ratings7.82 Ratings
Testing and debugging6.049 Ratings7.22 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Product A and Product B
SQL Server Integration Services
3.0
42 Ratings
90% below category average
Striim
9.5
1 Ratings
19% above category average
Integration with data quality tools3.037 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Integration with MDM tools3.037 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
SQL Server Integration ServicesStriim
Small Businesses
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 10.0 out of 10
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SQL Server Integration ServicesStriim
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(54 ratings)
8.8
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(9 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.8
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(8 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
SQL Server Integration ServicesStriim
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Ideal if the company is already a Microsoft shop, so chances are that it is free with SQL Server. Also, good for moving data between on premise systems. Not ideal for moving data to the cloud. No functionality out of the box to work with REST APIs. Stable product but definitely not the future
Read full review
Striim
Below samples are the well suited use cases; - Change data capture feature seamlessly works on popular RDMS. You can make enrichments on several data sources within the same Striim application. - You can install stand alone agents and start streaming log files to Striim servers. This is mainly useful for security operations or audit trail use cases.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Standard ETL use cases for daily loads
  • Loading incoming data from Vendors which is placed on FTP and adding them to the SQL Warehouse
  • Creating outgoing data files and writing them to Vendor FTPs
  • Easy Active Directory integration for seamless connections to SQL Server
  • CI/CD by hosting the code on visualstudio.com
Read full review
Striim
  • GoldenGate Trail reader which iss faster than Oracle CDC. It does not used logminer, hence there is no load on source Oracle database.
  • Easy installation and upgrade in 5 minutes
  • Support is very good. Fast and user friendly.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Connection managers for online data sources can be tricky to configure.
  • Performance tuning is an art form and trialing different data flow task options can be cumbersome. SSIS can do a better job of providing performance data including historical for monitoring.
  • Mapping destination using OLE DB command is difficult as destination columns are unnamed.
  • Excel or flat file connections are limited by version and type.
Read full review
Striim
  • License a bit expensive
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Some features should be revised or improved, some tools (using it with Visual Studio) of the toolbox should be less schematic and somewhat more flexible. Using for example, the CSV data import is still very old-fashioned and if the data format changes it requires a bit of manual labor to accept the new data structure
Read full review
Striim
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
SSIS is a great tool for most ETL needs. It has the 90% (or more) use cases covered and even in many of the use cases where it is not ideal SSIS can be extended via a .NET language to do the job well in a supportable way for almost any performance workload.
Read full review
Striim
No answers on this topic
Performance
Microsoft
SQL Server Integration Services performance is dependent directly upon the resources provided to the system. In our environment, we allocated 6 nodes of 4 CPUs, 64GB each, running in parallel. Unfortunately, we had to ramp-up to such a robust environment to get the performance to where we needed it. Most of the reports are completed in a reasonable timeframe. However, in the case of slow running reports, it is often difficult if not impossible to cancel the report without killing the report instance or stopping the service.
Read full review
Striim
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
The support, when necessary, is excellent. But beyond that, it is very rarely necessary because the user community is so large, vibrant and knowledgable, a simple Google query or forum question can answer almost everything you want to know. You can also get prewritten script tasks with a variety of functionality that saves a lot of time.
Read full review
Striim
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
The implementation may be different in each case, it is important to properly analyze all the existing infrastructure to understand the kind of work needed, the type of software used and the compatibility between these, the features that you want to exploit, to understand what is possible and which ones require integration with third-party tools
Read full review
Striim
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
I had nothing to do with the choice or install. I assume it was made because it's easy to integrate with our SQL Server environment and free. I'm not sure of any other enterprise level solution that would solve this problem, but I would likely have approached it with traditional scripting. Comparably free, but my own familiarity with trad scripts would be my final deciding factor. Perhaps with some further training on SSIS I would have a different answer.
Read full review
Striim
Faster, checkpointing better. CDC works well. The loading is faster. Easy upgrade and installation. Uses less resource.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Data integrity across various products allows unify certain processes inside the organization and save funds by reducing human labour factor.
  • Automated data unification allows us plan our inputs better and reduce over-warehousing by overbuying
  • The employee number, responsible for data management was reduced from 4 to 1 person
Read full review
Striim
  • We got the license at a discount price
Read full review
ScreenShots