Streamlabs vs. YouTube Live

Streamlabs is perfect for generating multimedia content with common elements such as cell phones, web cameras, PC screens, etc. By allowing video from multiple sources to be shown at the same time, it is perfect for example for technical product demonstrations. In the scenario described, parcticity is prioritized. However, if the proposed scenario is to generate high-quality multimedia content, you should use professional equipment for video, sound and editing.

Incentivized

It's really a great platform for people that want to go live or stream. There are already so many people using the platform and if you go live on youtube there should be a boost in your viewer count. It's also fun being able to stream/ go live, on your phone, iPad, camera, etc.

Incentivized

• Simultaneously accept various video sources such as cell phones, WEB cameras, etc.
• Accept multiple audio sources simultaneously, including PC audio.

Incentivized

• video quality
• fan/viewer interaction
• Live scheduling

Incentivized

• Sometimes CPU resource consumption is a bit high.
• Although it is understandable some functions are restricted to the PREMIUM version.

Incentivized

• user base could have an easy edit page

Incentivized

Although Adobe Premier Pro is a product for video professionals, it did not present the possibility of performing LIVE as Streamlabs, in addition to the fact that Adobe is a paid version exclusively. Streamlabs was more in line with our objectives as it is a tool aimed at the common user and not just professionals.

Incentivized

i just clicked the first one i saw, i haven't tried any other live streaming applications / platforms

Incentivized

• Even though it is a free Open Source software, the features have been excellent.

Incentivized