Likelihood to Recommend The qTest is well-suited for organizations transitioning to Agile or DevOps frameworks. It Streamlines test management with real-time collaboration and integrates with popular CI/CD tools. It excels in complex, large-scale projects needing centralized test cases management, traceability, and detailed reporting. However, organizations on a tight budget might find it cost prohibitive compared to simpler, low-cost alternatives.
Read full review Customizing fields and sorting make test case management easy to handle. The TCM's swift menu adjustments and dynamic graphs enhance the user experience, making it a delight to use.Few points which I do not dislike as such but can be improved. One is the ability to write longer tests. Another thing is that the UI when it comes to modifications like adding a new field, editing a field, etc requires few clicks and the path is slightly ambiguous.
Read full review Pros Highly customizable: we were able to organize our test cases in unique ways that made our work easier. Connectivity with Jira: being able to pull requirements information in from Jira was a big point for us. Standalone tool: Being a standalone tool on a dedicated server, we were able to have access to our tests regardless of whether our Jira server was down. Read full review Its easy to import test cases in Tuskr by using the csv import feature Test runs are easy to create and can include test cases from multiple suits. Reports of test runs make it easier to track all the cases that were covered at a particular instance before giving a release signoff. Read full review Cons In requirements , we can't add multiple test cases at once, or search multiple cases at once, need to do one by one. Here actually qtest needs to improve. Linking cloud hosted qtest and on-premise TOSCA is very difficult especially when you are working with client system with security wall. It requires tunnelling software which is not recommended. Read full review When you click into a specific test, the status automatically clears. it would be nice for this to be preserved when clicking in instead of clearing It would be nice to be able to add comments specific to certain steps in each test, instead of just one big comment box Since we use Tuskr for QA, we structure it as a table with instructions and expected results. because these are side by side, sometimes it is hard to go in a step-by-step order when there are multiple QA steps to take to complete the test. Read full review Likelihood to Renew This has been a core QA management tool for our organization and integrates well with our other SDLC platforms (Azure DevOps/Jira/Katalon).
Read full review Tuskr suits our organization needs
Read full review Usability qTest is actually intuitive and user-friendly, despite my other scathing review aspects
Nick Larsen Quality Assurance Manager - Application Development & Support
Read full review Support Rating The actual answer is 0. I have never experienced worse support, whether personal or professional
Nick Larsen Quality Assurance Manager - Application Development & Support
Read full review Implementation Rating Again, supporting documentation could have been a lot better
Nick Larsen Quality Assurance Manager - Application Development & Support
Read full review Alternatives Considered Extensive integration options with various third-party tools, enabling seamless integration into existing workflows. Allows for flexibility and customization of workflows, fields, and permissions to adapt to unique testing requirements. Supports robust requirements traceability, ensuring comprehensive test coverage. Lastly management decisions too
Read full review I have not worked with related testing suite before but Tuskr has been the favorite platform for running test suites. It has generated positive leads from the company data by offering the necessary testing support. It is easy to integrate with other applications to suit business demands. The system generate results from various testing suites that can shared with our clients.
Read full review Return on Investment Better organization and centralization of test cases has led to more cohesive team collaboration Speed to delivery, deployments to production, are mostly maintained Performance issues have led to testing delays requiring the team to switch to other methods which contributed to QA bottleneck issues and sometimes even missed sprint commitments Read full review Make the process to create tests a lot smoother, so increase production value by reducing bugs released to customers. Learning curves hinders some progress at the beginning. Pricing is great for a small team, worth it with 30 days trial as well. Read full review ScreenShots Tricentis qTest Screenshots