Upsun vs. Vercel

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Upsun
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Platform.sh helps companies of all sizes, from SaaS entrepreneurs looking to build, run, and scale their websites and web applications.N/A
Vercel
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
​Vercel (made by the creators of Next.js) is a cloud platform for static sites and Serverless Functions for a workflow. It enables developers to host websites and web services that deploy instantly, scale automatically, and requires no supervision, all with no configuration. The platform aims to enable frontend teams to work while combining the best developer experience with a focus on end-user performance.N/A
Pricing
UpsunVercel
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
UpsunVercel
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
UpsunVercel
Considered Both Products
Upsun
Chose Upsun
In our team we use Platform.sh mostly while sites are in developmental phase. Then we do a lift and shift to either Acquia or AWS depending on the type of sites we have. Platform.sh is really cost effective and more fluid in terms of Continuous Development hence the usage. …
Vercel
Chose Vercel
Vercel beats Heroku and DigitalOcean by a mile with pricing. Since Vercel uses serverless infrastructure, we don't pay for servers that don't get used, which is great for smaller platforms. Vercel Support is also very quick to respond, unlike DigitalOcean who took a while to …
Chose Vercel
Vercel cost structure is better than Netlify.
Features
UpsunVercel
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Upsun
9.3
Ratings
18% above category average
Vercel
8.0
Ratings
3% above category average
Scalability9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Services-enabled integration9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Development environment creation10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Development environment replication10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification9.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Platform management overhead00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Workflow engine capability00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Platform access control00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Issue recovery00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
UpsunVercel
Small Businesses
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.2 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
UpsunVercel
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
UpsunVercel
Likelihood to Recommend
In our organisation we are the only team that uses Platform.sh to host any site. This was a cost effective way for us as we were using Acquia Cloud earlier for these websites. We mostly use Platform.sh for those sites which are always in development as it is simpler and faster to handle these operations in Platform.sh. Then we do a lift and shift to Acquia as we move more towards the go live and post production maintenance side.
Read full review
As a result, there are no specific drawbacks, but if it supports Python applications, one can deploy even dynamic applications on Vercel without having to look for another hosting platform. I've used it to host one of my documentation websites. I edited and deployed the documentation using the pre-built template. It was very quick because all I had to do was enter the data; no coding was required.
Read full review
Pros
  • As this is a PaaS it mitigates the complexities of a Cloud infrastructure like Acquia
  • We are easily able to integrate our sites with different technologies like Python and Rest
  • Helps us in providing Continuous Development cloud deployment hosting solution
Read full review
  • Deploy Site
  • Integrate Giithub
  • Functions to use at scale and free
Read full review
Cons
  • Platform.sh is not for beginners in my opinion. It has a good amount of learning curve in my opinion.
  • As this is a PaaS, teams habituated with cloud infrastructure may miss the server side support from their cloud teams. I believe you will have to work on server bugs more on your own.
  • During normal maintenance periods, integrations may fail if you are working on your sites in that time, in my experience.
Read full review
  • Interface Revamp
  • Cost reduction
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Vercel's good usability and developer experience make me happy to visit their website when I need to configure my deployments. It's very easy to navigate, configure, and manage my projects, and the developer experience is so seamless that I don't have to think much when I push changes to git.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
In our team we use Platform.sh mostly while sites are in developmental phase. Then we do a lift and shift to either Acquia or AWS depending on the type of sites we have. Platform.sh is really cost effective and more fluid in terms of Continuous Development hence the usage. After said development is done, we generally lift and shift to Acquia for more content heavy sites and to AWS for more transaction oriented sites.
Read full review
Vercel beats Heroku and DigitalOcean by a mile with pricing. Since Vercel uses serverless infrastructure, we don't pay for servers that don't get used, which is great for smaller platforms. Vercel Support is also very quick to respond, unlike DigitalOcean who took a while to get back to me after they didn't honor platform credits they sent me.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Continuous development for sites in build has been fluid
  • Platform.sh is really cost effective when comparing to AWS or Acquia Cloud
  • On the other side, lack of server side support demands a big learning curve from its users in my opinion.
Read full review
  • Reduced amount of staff time required to deploy applications and websites
  • Improved staging environments by automatically deploying changes on pull requests
  • Allowed for collaboration from members of the open source community with strong git integrations
Read full review
ScreenShots

Upsun Screenshots

Screenshot of