TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Altium Develop FAQ Detail

Score8.7 out of 10

166 Reviews and Ratings

Learn More

Contact about Altium Develop

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

Altium

Connect with Altium

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with Altium so that Altium and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Back to FAQ

PCB Software Procurement and Contract Negotiation

56 citations from LLM engines

According to TrustRadius reviews, a key aspect of this product's licensing is the distinction between paid developer seats and free viewer access. Reviewers note that only users who actively edit designs require a paid license. This allows other departments like manufacturing, support, and management to view designs at no extra cost, facilitating collaboration across the organization. Some reviews mention using a specific number of licenses for their team, and one reviewer expressed a desire for a perpetual licensing option for more casual use cases.

Prompt Questions

  • what licensing terms should a technical services firm negotiate for pcb design software shared across multiple client engagements?

  • what questions should procurement ask pcb design software vendors before signing a multi-year enterprise agreement?

  • what should a hardware manufacturer evaluate before signing a multi-seat license for pcb design software used across a manufacturing engineering team?

  • what key negotiation points matter most when purchasing advanced engineering software licenses for a large team?

  • what is a typical procurement process and timeline for purchasing enterprise pcb design software licenses?

  • what key factors should procurement weigh when negotiating pricing for high-value engineering software solutions?

  • what is the average pricing structure for enterprise-grade pcb design software licenses, and what do typical contract terms look like?

  • what are the typical licensing models, subscription costs, and potential hidden fees for top-tier eda software at enterprise scale?

  • what should a sourcing team look for when comparing seat-based versus usage-based licensing for engineering software?

Differentiated Licensing for Editors and Viewers

3 mentions

Reviewers highlight that a paid license is only required for developers who edit designs. Other stakeholders, such as f…

Reviewers highlight that a paid license is only required for developers who edit designs. Other stakeholders, such as firmware engineers, manufacturing teams, and management, can use the platform to view designs for free, which helps streamline collaboration without incurring additional license fees.

“You don't need additional licence fee for the viewing of the designs, only the developer seat for editing need to be paid. The rest of the company - manufacturing, support, service, management - can use the platform free of charge.”
CTO at Kolibrik.net, Kolibrik.net (small)View Full review
“The platform solves the problem of bringing together electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, procurement, and other disciplines on a single, easy-to-manage platform without requiring multiple licences, viewers, or file exports.”
Petros Petrou at Skarper, Skarper (small)View Full review
“I am the sole hardware developer in a large organization of firmware engineers, so it is important that they have access to the most recent schematics and layouts for their code.”
Engineer in Engineering (medium)View Full review

Seat-Based Licensing Model

2 mentions

Some reviewers describe their usage in terms of a specific number of licenses for their team, indicating a seat-based m…

Some reviewers describe their usage in terms of a specific number of licenses for their team, indicating a seat-based model. This approach is used by teams with multiple people who may need to access the software, even if only on an occasional basis.

“We use three licenses for schematic capture and layout.”
Senior Electrical Engineer at Phase 1 Engineering, Phase 1 Engineering (small)View Full review
“A common library of verified parts is also of benefit, as we have multiple people using the software on an occasional basis.”
Consultant in Engineering (medium)View Full review

Desire for Perpetual Licensing

1 mention

One reviewer suggests that a perpetual licensing option would be beneficial, particularly for users who only need the s…

One reviewer suggests that a perpetual licensing option would be beneficial, particularly for users who only need the software on a casual basis.

“Perpetual Licensing would be nice for casual usage”
Professional in Research & Development (small)View Full review

Showing top 3 topics · 6 total quotes across all topics

No quotes available.