TrustRadius Insights for Ghost are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.
Recommendations
Based on user reviews, the most common recommendations for Ghost CMS are to consider costs, difficulty of implementation, and potential benefits before deciding on the platform. Users suggest evaluating the features required in a content management system and consulting with the company to determine if Ghost CMS meets their needs.
Users also recommend self-hosting Ghost CMS for a smoother and easier experience, especially for those with a skilled technical background and knowledge of website hosting.
Lastly, Ghost CMS is highly recommended as a great alternative to WordPress for simple and effective blogging. Users appreciate its superior UI, out-of-the-box SEO support, and the valuable blog information provided by the platform.
In summary, users recommend considering various factors before choosing Ghost CMS, highlighting the importance of cost evaluation and feature analysis. They also emphasize the benefits of self-hosting for a smoother experience and praise Ghost CMS as an excellent alternative to WordPress, citing its user-friendly interface and built-in SEO support.
Ghost is our primary tool for publishing web and email content for our audience. It is the only product used by our company/staff to create develop and present our website and our newsletter and to present our podcast.
Pros
Creating a newsletter for web and email simultaneously
Allowing for paid subscriptions
Allowing content to be segmented by subscription type
Cons
They wysiwig editor is missing critical functions like superscript and subscript
The markdown complement has those features but it doesn’t integrate well with the wysiwig editor
Footnoting is hard to do
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well suited for distributed writing and publishing with a subscription component.