IBM PowerVM rocksolid virtualization for missioncritical workloads.
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
Pros
- Virtual machine consolidation
- Reliability and availability
- Scalable
- Flexible
- Agile
Cons
- The system management experience via the HMC can be improved. It is great right now but needs to be a bit more intuitive. It feels a bit dated compared to other virtual/cloud platforms.
- Automation integration is sometimes difficult and tied to the operating system limitations. Better integration into platforms like Ansible Automation Platform would be beneficial.
- Steep learning curve. This is a good thing but perhaps some defaults for system provisioning could be put in place or an AI bot to assist in system provisioning and management.
- Fragmented system monitoring. There are tools provided but if they could be in a more centralised grafana style dashboard view to give a clear picture across HMC, VIO, Physicial and virtual adapters.
Return on Investment
- Cost saving through consolidation. IBM PowerVM allows a really significant consolidation of workloads. Reduces the hardware footprint and DataCentre space required without sacrificing on performance and high availability.
- Stable platform. IBM PowerVM is a highly stable and proven platform. It greatly reduces the risk of outages for mission critical workloads. This avoids the reputational and organisational costs associated with unplanned downtime.
- Improved efficiency. IBM PowerVM is the base for our operational efficiency and standardisation. This allows operational teams to focus on delivery of solutions rather than routine platform maintenance.



