LoadComplete

LoadComplete

About TrustRadius Scoring
Score 7.7 out of 100
LoadComplete

Overview

Recent Reviews

Read all reviews

Popular Features

View all 5 features
  • End to end performance management (5)
    8.0
    80%
  • Real time monitoring (5)
    7.7
    77%
  • Deployment model flexibility (5)
    6.4
    64%

Video Reviews

Leaving a video review helps other professionals like you evaluate products. Be the first one in your network to record a review of LoadComplete, and make your voice heard!

Pricing

View all pricing
N/A
Unavailable

What is LoadComplete?

SmartBear LoadComplete is a performance, stress and load testing tool for web and Rich Internet Applications, including ASP.NET, Ajax, Flash/Flex and Silverlight.

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting / Integration Services

Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?

4 people want pricing too

Alternatives Pricing

What is Tricentis NeoLoad?

Tricentis NeoLoad is a solution for continuous performance testing software to automate API and application load testing. It was developed by the French company Neotys and acquired by Tricentis, along with the company, in March 2021.

What is k6?

Stockholm based k6 offers their k6 load testing tool (formerly known as Load Impact) to simplify and automate load and performance testing for agile software development teams. Through integration with other automation and Continuous Integration tools, k6 states they enable performance testing…

Features Scorecard

Load Testing

7.9
79%

Product Details

What is LoadComplete?

SmartBear LoadComplete is a performance, stress and load testing tool for web and Rich Internet Applications, including ASP.NET, Ajax, Flash/Flex and Silverlight.

LoadComplete Competitors

LoadComplete Technical Details

Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo

Frequently Asked Questions

LambdaTest are common alternatives for LoadComplete.

Reviewers rate Integrated performance data highest, with a score of 9.3.

The most common users of LoadComplete are from Mid-sized Companies (51-1,000 employees) and the Computer Software industry.

Comparisons

View all alternatives

Reviews and Ratings

 (6)

Ratings

Reviews

(1-5 of 5)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We have been used the LoadComplete tool in our company lately to simulate traffic hits on applications. The main goal is to simulate the required number of customer hits the application at the same second. and to determine when system got crashed. Also we are using the tool by our department only ( Quality Department ). So after any DB Migration or new Release we need to run our scripts to verify that the customer performance requirments are met expectations.
  • Very detailed documentation, easy to support
  • Running my test on Cloud
  • The reports graph are very clear with logs and errors found in the report manel
  • Record and Play Feature
  • coding is not an optional in the loadComplete scripts
  • the tool is too slow after exceeding 1000 Concurent users
If you are testing an application and you don't have experience in performance testing, this tool will help you to test the load with some documentation help. It's very easy to use. and if you have complex scenarios to determine the coding and adjusting graphs, the LoadComplete will not be a helpful tool for you.
Kate Woodward | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
LoadComplete is a load testing tool that is used for evaluating the load testing process. I have been using LoadComplete for a while now and it is the best for test automation. We also have been using LoadComplete for generating traffic in our overall applications. The most common task is to check how an application works after one or some components have been changed.
  • We have been using LoadComplete in the Tech Department. I usually use LoadComplete to test the speed and loads of several applications we develop in-house.
  • Moreover, we have also used LoadComplete to create reports and at the same time report any issues that we notice during a certain load.
  • It is an affordable platform.
  • LoadComplete has a lot of good features which has made my life so much easier so there are many pros of this tool as well. It is quite easy to use and comes in very handy.
  • Some of the cons of LoadComplete are that it gets slow when the size of the test increases. Also, the coding is not possible with LoadComplete.
  • Moreover, it needs to support flexibility for a framework that can be customized based on the needs. Also, some graphs remain empty which is confusing for me as a user and I would like a description of why a certain graph cannot gather data.
I think that LoadComplete is adequate when you have Testcomplete. If LoadComplete is not paired with Testcomplete then there would be a bit of a learning curve. People who are already using Testcomplete will find it easy to start with LoadComplete but the tool itself has a lot to improve and support customization to suit our needs.
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
LoadComplete is used to evaluate the load testing process. We already had TestComplete for test automation so we started to use LoadComplete for load testing.
  • Easy and handy UI options to select
  • Good support from documentation
  • Eye-catching results
  • Slow when the size of tests increase
  • Coding is not possible
  • Need to support flexibility for a framework that can be customized based on needs
If we already use TestComplete for test automation and there is an urgent need to perform load testing, then it is easy to start with LoadComplete but the tool itself has to improve a lot and support customization to suit our needs. I would say if load testing is the main criteria to use this tool, then there are other open-source tools like JMeter that can support better than this. Of course, as it is an enterprise tool it has very good reporting and record and playback options that I see as an advantage for basic users.
Customer support is good. If any concerns are raised, they are usually resolved soon, but when questioned about a feature LoadComplete does not support, it usually takes more time to resolve.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We use loadcomplete in the QA and Tech Ops department. We use it to test the speed and load of several applications we develop in-house. We use LoadComplete to create reports and report any issues that we may notice during a certain load. As we develop new applications to update our old ones we will be using LoadComplete from day 1 to make sure our new application does not cause any performance issues to our server as well as have the best experience for our customers.
  • Able to generate detailed reports.
  • Displays graphs during load testing to show the user (Performance Engineer) where a bottleneck occurred.
  • Ability to run tests in the cloud.
  • Port test scripts from TestComplete.
  • Some graphs remain empty, I would like a description of why a certain graph cannot gather data.
  • Allow user to customize the graph.
Loadcomplete is well suited if you have testcomplete. The ability to port over automation tests to turn into Performance tests is one of the best features the company can offer. With the proper training anyone can use loadcomplete, especially if you write your own scripts.

If loadcomplete is not paired with testcomplete, there could be a bit of a learning curve. One feature I don't like about LoadComplete is the lack to write your own scripts. You must do the play back, record and update several variables if you are to have dynamic tests.
Yury Vakhatov | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We use LoadComplete to generate traffic in our applications. The common task is to check how an application works after one or few components were changed - e.g. after migration to a new database or after a new module was connected to the system. Our QA Department does control of performance changes and provides a detailed report to our system analytics and developers.

As a little bonus, although LoadComplete is not a tool for API testing, it can run API calls, and sometimes it is rather helpful for us.
  • Smart built-in data correlation. Automatically helps to correlate different dynamic parameters like user session ids, authorization tokens, db-identifiers and so on. Works very fast and save your time for test development.
  • Record & Play feature - LoadComplete can record application servers' metrics like CPU and memory usage.
  • Rather slow work with logging, especially on long tests. Test logs can occupy a big memory space.
  • Coding is not presented in LoadComplete, we can use only predefined features, so we have some limitations in test development.
Good solution for fast development of load tests, especially for staff without programming skills.