Filter Ratings and Reviews
Filter 8 vetted LoadComplete reviews and ratings
Reviews (1-4 of 4)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why.
July 29, 2021
We used LoadComplete by SmartBear as a load testing tool for one of our clients who requested to perform load testing on an application that had some failures on production after days with heavy load. We decided to go with LoadComplete as a trial and to adopt the tool if it met our needs.
- Load Testing
- Automating tests and integrating with CD pipelines
- Recording tests to avoid writing scripts
- Outdated UI
September 28, 2020
LoadComplete is used to evaluate the load testing process. We already had TestComplete for test automation so we started to use LoadComplete for load testing.
- Easy and handy UI options to select
- Good support from documentation
- Eye-catching results
- Slow when the size of tests increase
- Coding is not possible
- Need to support flexibility for a framework that can be customized based on needs
October 09, 2017
We use LoadComplete to generate traffic in our applications. The common task is to check how an application works after one or few components were changed - e.g. after migration to a new database or after a new module was connected to the system. Our QA Department does control of performance changes and provides a detailed report to our system analytics and developers.
As a little bonus, although LoadComplete is not a tool for API testing, it can run API calls, and sometimes it is rather helpful for us.
As a little bonus, although LoadComplete is not a tool for API testing, it can run API calls, and sometimes it is rather helpful for us.
- Smart built-in data correlation. Automatically helps to correlate different dynamic parameters like user session ids, authorization tokens, db-identifiers and so on. Works very fast and save your time for test development.
- Record & Play feature - LoadComplete can record application servers' metrics like CPU and memory usage.
- Rather slow work with logging, especially on long tests. Test logs can occupy a big memory space.
- Coding is not presented in LoadComplete, we can use only predefined features, so we have some limitations in test development.
December 12, 2017
We use loadcomplete in the QA and Tech Ops department. We use it to test the speed and load of several applications we develop in-house. We use LoadComplete to create reports and report any issues that we may notice during a certain load. As we develop new applications to update our old ones we will be using LoadComplete from day 1 to make sure our new application does not cause any performance issues to our server as well as have the best experience for our customers.
- Able to generate detailed reports.
- Displays graphs during load testing to show the user (Performance Engineer) where a bottleneck occurred.
- Ability to run tests in the cloud.
- Port test scripts from TestComplete.
- Some graphs remain empty, I would like a description of why a certain graph cannot gather data.
- Allow user to customize the graph.
LoadComplete Scorecard Summary
Feature Scorecard Summary
What is LoadComplete?
SmartBear LoadComplete is a performance, stress and load testing tool for web and Rich Internet Applications, including ASP.NET, Ajax, Flash/Flex and Silverlight.
Categories: Load Testing
LoadComplete Competitors
LambdaTest, TestRail, Rainforest QA
LoadComplete Technical Details
| Operating Systems: | Unspecified |
|---|---|
| Mobile Application: | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
What are LoadComplete's top competitors?
LambdaTest, Apache JMeter, and Micro Focus LoadRunner (formerly HP LoadRunner) are common alternatives for LoadComplete.
What is LoadComplete's best feature?
Reviewers rate Integrated performance data highest, with a score of 8.
Who uses LoadComplete?
The most common users of LoadComplete are from Mid-size Companies and the Banking industry.