Oracle WebLogic Server Pricing

“Open connections in JDBC translate into lost money for support processes The cost may be high, but the return on investment comes quickly due to reduced incidents on web infrastructure.”

“[It] is probably a bit more expensive than other competitors like apache tomcat or NGINX, but is worth the investment if you consider the savings from time to get code into production.”

“We can not afford for operations so it is worth investing in an engine that gives us all the stability and security you need, so each dollar is worth it.”

“Not able to kill/terminate the stuck thread, the only way is to restart the managed server (JVM) License cost is too high, for small businesses. … Also, its license cost is too high.”

“WebLogic Application Server definitely had a positive ROI since all the applications are deployed on a single platform and making maintenance extremely cost effective.”

“However, this might not be an ideal tool if you are on a low budget as WebLogic is very expensive.”

“Confidence / Reliability - Very very small application failure rate < 2 incidents per year (if managed correctly) Cost - Costs for software, and support and training - But you get what you pay for.”

“I think this product is a little more expensive.”

“If you need a managed clustered, fail safe solution for a large scale enterprise project and you are not worrying about your budget then use WebLogic.”

“Cost Saving.”

“It's well suited for medium to high volume transaction applications and can be used on multiple OS platforms.
It is quite expensive though and if you are looking for a cheaper alternative, then...”