Palo Alto Networks WildFire Pricing

zero-day threats and unknown malware is critical. Small businesses may find the cost of advanced subscriptions prohibitive, especially if they only need basic

there. Where user usually don't communicate towards internet because the cost of WildFire is little high so we should use only for internet facing. … As we all know the product of Palo Alto is little bit expensive but its performance is far better than any of its competitors.…

helps to alleviate compliance issues by enabling on-site sandboxing of files. Cost-wise, it's competitive with other comparable solutions on the market, and

implied Palo Alto Networks solutions, I'll definitely recommend. From the cost perspective it's very competitive even from the scratch to get a Palo Alto … Adding it to the already implied PAN infrastructure is cheap compared to other vendors. Opening WF integration on the Datacenter segmentation … is the cost. You do not nee…

malware. It can be deployed on-prem or in the cloud. It is a relatively expensive license considering all Palo Alto customers get WildFire, but only the … limits They need to be able to submit and scan more file types Rather expensive … Cost aside, Palo Alto Networks…

Cost I would personally like to see more JSON support in the API rather than XML … network/endpoints. We've been very please since we installed it and I would say cost of the Palo Altos is the only drawback. If money were no object I'd go

Another huge plus is the simplicity of managing and ease of scalability. Its cost is competitive with similar/like products available. … Although expensive to implement correctly, seeing ROI for us is pr…

Wildfire can be relatively expensive, so smaller or extremely cost-sensitive organizations might not be able to justify the cost vs. waiting for daily antivirus … Wildfire can be relatively expensive, so smaller or extremely cost-sensitive organizations…