Ansible Pricing

consumes a lot of resources. It needs the paid version of AAP, which requires a cost.

role into small groups of systems. I no longer use puppet however. The price was much higher when we switched, and the markdown language wasn't as nice

cost reduction time saving repeatability

Reduced O&M cost Consistency across environment Reliable change implementations

Saving time for repetitive activities Create value

reported on monthly. This allows management to see 'real-world' time (aka) cost savings automation has provided A direct negative can be the time required

workflows. The scope is all that's related to datacenter and how we deliver value to our customers.

possible at the Enterprise level. Cost is the biggest area that it is not appropriate. Licensing can be very expensive and may limit some of the use cases

for our production servers only. The product is very expensive to use, so we might look for a cheaper solution for our non-production servers. One of the

very expensive, and our company opted not to do it. Instead, we used classes from Udemy or Cloud Guru. I don't see why Redhat couldn't offer cheaper hands-on

Massive time savor and cost reduction of man hours.

Reduced cost and improved the bootstrapping process

lower pricing for Ansible Tower licensing … Allows us to increase velocity we have moved to AWX due to cost

The price is a bit high. Lack of mobile apps for iOS and Android. Complexity in third-party

sameple playbooks from Red Hat community Pricing more focus for windows … performance cost realibility

except for Aria Automation. But, it is extensible and open and has a lower cost to entry.

Price. Getting too complex.

Low cost patching management

Simplify resource deployment Reduce cost to deploy and maintain devices

customer environments with short notice and with little workforce so it's very cost-efficient. There are less mistakes because setting up machines requires little

YAML/JSON and with Modules available, it does save time which gives savings on cost.

Python and RHEL. We selected Ansible because its easy barrier to entry and pricing model for new users with not many nodes to manage. We will continue to develop

servers. Ansible has made it cheaper to spin up a new version of the server rather than diagnose a problematic server, costing valuable time to restoration

(configuration ) file Easy and fast deployment Save unnecessary onsite travel cost Secure SSH connection Ready to use built in many useful modules Use Python … Positive impact is mainly on time and cost savings Main negative impact is faced when an individual needs to…

roles makes for better organization and readability. Ansible Galaxy makes it cost and time efficient by finding and re-using existing automation that others … Cost and time efficient due to the community open-sourcing playbooks and roles