SOLIDWORKSPricing

design errors improved product quality ultimately a positive ROI through cost savings and enhanced competitiveness

are more advanced in certain areas of application, while SOLIDWORKS is more cost effective.

low cost of licensing, with respect to other CAD modeling software. Given that we only use it if needed, it provides the best tools for the price and for

appropriate for single users that could get similar results from a lower priced product. Also less appropriate for teams that only need the modeling basic … Onshape is a direct competitor. It has great entry level pricing and it is easy to access with no installation required.…

draw/adapt my design, it harshly interprets the references which have no value to me. The easiest exact is to think about when you have a Microsoft Word … relatively limited use we need at our company, it would be useful to have a cheaper option that was more stripped down but still had some capabilities. Something … Something in-between SW and eDrawings, for example…

basically anything. It is not the cheapest option and it is not the most expensive one either but it definitely has its uses with an experienced user. From

makes the program even slower Insufficient official support despite the large cost of the program Very Slow Text Editor is dated and impractical Solidworks

points to make construction and manipulation easier SOLIDWORKS is a bit expensive and doesn't come with a good way to manipulate the 2D files you can export

In my mind, whilst it's understandably expensive (for the commercial versions), SOLIDWORKS is the leading CAD software on

Slow. Expensive. Buggy. … SOLIDWORKS has all of these options at an additional cost. Fusion 360 may be a cheaper option; however, being in the cloud, simulations are costly and larger assemblies

AutoCAD. Pricing is comparable to SOLIDWORKS, but SOLIDWORKS is a better value. SketchUp is a nice tool for quickly sketching something to help visualize … is not practical as a manufacturing design tool. It is, however, the most cost-effective of the three.

progression from the beginning. In its infancy it was a good option at a good price for a stand-alone 3D program. It was occasionally unstable in the early years

Version conversion to earlier releases for file exchange. Subscription value for the money. … It allowed us to be competitive in the engineering industry. Great value for the money. Easy to be paid off for engineering services if used most

sometimes the redesign of the interface is difficult to get used to Very expensive and you have to be on a subscription

the most part, easy to deploy and maintain and predictable with regards to cost of ownership. … you're looking for affordable FEA or CFD AND CAD, then SOLIDWORKS is best-fitted. … Budgeting for SOLIDWORKS is very predictive and affordable. Deploying a leased

The entry point cost is low for the value received, making SOLIDWORKS a great choice for MCAD. SOLIDWORKS

penalizes those who have chosen not to upgrade over time. Many small firms can't afford to do so as often.

incredible 3D mechanical parts for our customers. It is not a cheap software, however, the cost-benefit we have experienced has been amazing when considering … amount of tools it can sometimes feel overwhelming. This software is really expensive. 8

am able to draw things out before I prototype them. SOLIDWORKS does get expensive for a startup company like mine, because you have to pay for seats individually

Cost for new users, which they seem to be addressing Not many other issues I can

Positive - easy to use and easy to collaborate with ePDM features High up front cost of features and add-ons for the basic package Easy to learn … in SOLIDWORKS already existing with some of the engineering base. Cost, value and ease of implementation also were factors that…

can incorporate its use across different areas of your company. Low entry price for 3D CAD software. Great tool for designing new product and ideas from … contains such a full package solution that it is constantly growing at a great price, and easy to learn for those coming into new areas. The support system has … Pro-E has been around a long time and definitely has…

program for smaller companies and for newer users. The licenses are less expensive than other programs. Newer users will find it easy to learn the program

modeling, analysis, simulations, optimizations, production planning and product cost estimation.

capability internally is an absolute must. The cost of investment is virtually negigible compared to the value provided. The subscription plan entitles users … communication about the details of how to transition, the options available, and the cost impacts. My concern is that this would occur in the future as well. When … consultants to generate our designs and specifications. This adds a…