SpiraTeam Reviews & Insights

Score9 out of 10

4 Reviews and Ratings

Community insights

TrustRadius Insights for SpiraTeam are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.

Recommendations

Users of SpiraTeam commonly recommend the following: affordable pricing, easy configuration, and user-friendly interface.

Many users have praised SpiraTeam for its cheap price, making it a cost-effective solution for businesses. Reviewers have found it to be user-friendly and easy to configure. Additionally, they appreciate the intuitive design of the interface, which makes it simple to navigate through different features and functionalities.

Considering these recommendations, customers can benefit from the affordability, configurability, and user-friendly nature of SpiraTeam.

SpiraTeam Reviews

3 Reviews

Spira Team- One Tool to manage all test activities

Rating: 9 out of 10

Incentivized

December 2, 2021

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We have used this tool for our organization and it has worked perfectly. It has got all the features that Test and Defect management tools should have. SpiraTeam: easy to implement, easy to use, well documented. Inflectra delivers a very fast and impressive support

Pros

Good Defect Tracking
Easy to maintain Test Cycle
Configurable Reports
Easy to maintain Roles and access

Cons

Customer should be 24 Hrs

Likelihood to Recommend

*Well Suited for Organizations having [fewer] numbers of Tech People that [means] it's easy to operate and maintain. Currently find no scenarios for its less [appropriateness]

Verified User

Professional in Information Technology (1001-5000 employees)

Vetted Review

10 years of experience

Excellent team suite to support a compliant software development lifecycle

Rating: 9 out of 10

March 3, 2019

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use SpiraTeam in the whole organization in our German office as well as in our US subsidiary. We are using SpiraTeam for requirements management, test planning, and execution as well as incident tracking. As a company providing customized software development for the health care industry we are in a strongly regulated marked (FDA, IVD) and need a solid tool with a full audit trail, versioning, and multi-user environment as well as provide online access to our clients.

Pros

Very easy to use.
Entire collaboration suite for the software development lifecycle.
Configurable to particular project needs.

Cons

Reporting could be made a bit easier.
Some functions are not always absolutely intuitive.
Document baselining can be tricky.
Some configuration can only be done in the database and is not explained as by the books.

Likelihood to Recommend

It is easy to define structures and documentation "modules". This allows for a workgroup-oriented approach and supports SCRUM. However, in the medical device market SCRUM does not work well for documentation. Therefore the modularized approach on the requirements and testing side supports sprint development, while the depth of documentation needed for compliance may not be "ready" and can be completed later.

Heinz Rothe

President in Corporate at apartis Information Management (11-50 employees)

Vetted Review

4 years of experience

View profile