StackPath Edge Delivery Reviews and Ratings

Rating: 9 out of 10

Score

9 out of 10

Community insights

TrustRadius Insights for StackPath Edge Delivery are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.

Pros

Fast network speeds: Several users have found the caching feature of the product to be helpful, contributing to fast network speeds and improved website loading speed. This has been appreciated by many reviewers for its ability to provide a smooth browsing experience.

Easy administration interface: The administration interface of the product has been praised by multiple users for being easy to use. This user-friendly interface makes it convenient for customers to manage and control various aspects of the service without any hassle.

Responsive customer service: Users have highlighted the importance of responsive customer service and have expressed their satisfaction with the option to reach out to a real person for urgent support. This prompt assistance has been valued by several reviewers as it ensures timely resolution of any issues they may encounter.

Reviews

4 Reviews

Great CDN with extra features

Rating: 9 out of 10

Incentivized

October 24, 2022

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Great Content Delivery Network with extra features

Pros

Improving website loading speed
Monitoring website access speed
Monitoring website availability

Cons

Easy of management
Web interface

Likelihood to Recommend

StackPath is a great Content Delivery Network platform that improves website loading speed and also allows for website monitoring. In our case, we use that as a regular Content Delivery Network to make sure our website can be accessed with good performance in terms of webpages being opened as fast as possible. we also use it to monitor our websites for availability, so we know when we have any issues with our web hosting provider very quickly.

Carlos Coque

System Administrator in Information Technology at IBEX Payroll Services (11-50 employees)

Vetted Review

3 years of experience

Can't do better than StackPath if you need just a CDN

Rating: 9 out of 10

Incentivized

August 26, 2021

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We're a publishing company, so the entire company benefits from our StackPath deployment in terms of site performance. StackPath has data center locations in major US cities, placing our content (images, logos, JS) quite close to our user base. It has helped greatly in maintaining uptime performance; we've never, ever had an issue with StackPath's CDN and Edge services not being available in the 3+ years we've used them.

Pros

Service availability
Ease of integration with various web properties
Easy to use administration interface
Free private SSL certs for CDN
Cheap object storage and delivery

Cons

The management interface is easy to use but a bit crowded. Wouldn't mind being able to create a custom dashboard.
The web application firewall could be more robust when compared to CloudFlare.
They don't yet support TLS1.3
They will serve assets when your origin is not available but it isn't a full site delivery service.

Likelihood to Recommend

Well suited to:

<ol><li>Startups - Very competitive pricing, better than AWS for object storage and CDN.</li><li>The less technical - for those looking to implement a CDN, it doesn't get any easier than StackPath</li><li>The more technical - Well documented API, serverless scripting and container deployments</li><li>Fast object delivery - StackPath tends to be faster (sometimes much more ) than AWS S3. See below however...

</li></ol><div>Not so well suited to:</div><div><ol><li>Multi-tiered web applications</li><li>Ultra high bandwidth requirements. Stackpath isn't meant to be a substitute for AWS or Azure when you're looking to push 100s of TBs of traffic.</li><li>Object storage works well if you don't need fine-grained bucket lifecycle or permissions management.

</li></ol></div>

Verified User

Director in Information Technology (11-50 employees)

Vetted Review

6 years of experience

An ex-CDN professional use StackPath because of its rich services/features and granular configuration options.

Rating: 8 out of 10

Incentivized

February 8, 2021

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use StackPath WAF service to protect our website. We also use CDN services to improve the performance of our website and user experience.

Pros

Price competitive.
Easy to use.
Good reporting.
Quick to deploy.
Start-up friendly.
Good technical information via blog, FAQ and community discussion.
I can talk to real person for urgent support.

Cons

Improve CDN performance in Asia and South America.
More price ranges to meet different customer needs.
Annual customer satisfaction review.

Likelihood to Recommend

Total solution to meet both web performance and security needs. Combo offers that are price-friendly. Start-up friendly.

Andre Cheung

CEO & Founder in Corporate at Robotics Cats (1-10 employees)

Vetted Review

1 year of experience

View profile

Easy to Use, Delivers on Promise. Still maturing.

Rating: 8 out of 10

Incentivized

January 29, 2021

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use StackPath as a CDN. We also utilize the firewall and edge-side scripting.

Pros

Caching.
Fast network.
Edge scripting.

Cons

Analytics.
Many options hidden in API.
Web console.

Likelihood to Recommend

It is great as a primary or backup CDN. We have had no issues with performance. The cache hit ratio is high.

Some of the options are hidden within the API and you have to configure them with API calls, such as configuring signed fetch requests to an S3 origin. These should be in CLI or Web Console. The deployment of edge side scripts with the CLI or CI/CD could be improved.

Jason Byrne

Vice President Of Engineering in Engineering at FloSports (201-500 employees)

Vetted Review

2 years of experience

View profile

Loading Reviews List....

Can't do better than StackPath if you need just a CDN

Rating: 9 out of 10

Incentivized

August 26, 2021

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Pros

Service availability
Ease of integration with various web properties
Easy to use administration interface
Free private SSL certs for CDN
Cheap object storage and delivery

Cons

The management interface is easy to use but a bit crowded. Wouldn't mind being able to create a custom dashboard.
The web application firewall could be more robust when compared to CloudFlare.
They don't yet support TLS1.3
They will serve assets when your origin is not available but it isn't a full site delivery service.

Likelihood to Recommend

Well suited to:

</li></ol></div>

Verified User

Director in Information Technology (11-50 employees)

Vetted Review

6 years of experience