Item: ACE
Rating: 8
Author: Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with ACE

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We primarily use ACE to install applications or process APIs for our stakeholders, enabling them to process transactions or communicate via messaging. This way, it can connect to our database servers to get their required transactions or posting details. We use ACE to process a large number of transactions, as we handle financial transactions.

Pros and Cons

Pros

Process APIs.
Activity Logs.
Applications or bar files.

Cons

Detailed transactions.
Only DB transactional logs.
Setup and configuration.

Return on Investment

Fast deployment.
Easily manageable dashboard.
Straightforward UI.

Usability

It is a very great tool, user-friendly even. You just need to get your head in and immerse yourself in the tool so you can manage and tweak its configuration to suit your liking and performance. The support team is an A-plus since they are available most of the time.

Key Insights

Do you think ACE delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with ACE's feature set?

Yes

Did ACE live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of ACE go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy ACE again?

Yes

Likelihood to Recommend

It’s a great way to process transactions depending on the logic of your applications. Real-time tracking for logs can be monitored via the backend; however, we cannot pinpoint which transactional logs it is. We usually ask the DB admin to provide the ACE entry and exit logs for this. I would love to have that functionality readily available at any given time, without relying on the other team.

Comments

Please log in to join the conversation

ACE - brief overview.