It’s not the best, but it’ll do just fine.
Overall Satisfaction with Adobe Firefly
We’ve used Adobe Firefly early on to create fun text banners for flyers. Now we primarily use it to create innocuous images for graphics. Smaller images that won’t impact a design’s authenticity. Often we create background patterns, support textures, and insignificant landscape imagery. We avoid genAI images with humans. It doesn’t sit well with our audience.
Pros
- Background images
- Background patterns
- Generic landscapes
Cons
- People
- Accurate representations of anything seen by the human eye
- Animals
- It hasn’t impacted is.
- We make funny images for fun sometimes.
- We appreciate a good stock photography resource more now.
It is average compared to other genAI resources. Its interface is somewhat meh, but its access to resources is reliable. We don’t use Adobe firefly exclusively. We use it along side many other ai resources. Our self propelled system running stable diffusion is probably the standard these days. Hopefully Adobe can step up its game and not charge too much for it.
Do you think Adobe Firefly delivers good value for the price?
No
Are you happy with Adobe Firefly's feature set?
Yes
Did Adobe Firefly live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Adobe Firefly go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Adobe Firefly again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation