Anaplan from model builder Lense
Updated July 19, 2025
Anaplan from model builder Lense

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Anaplan
ChatGPT said:We use Anaplan to streamline our Master Production Scheduling (MPS) and Material Requirements Planning (MRP) processes for a CPG (Consumer Packaged Goods) client. Before Anaplan, the client struggled with disconnected Excel-based planning, limited visibility across supply and demand, and frequent stockouts or overproduction.
Anaplan helped centralize and automate their planning process. The MPS model enabled planners to balance supply with demand using real-time data, while the MRP model calculated material requirements based on production plans, inventory levels, and lead times. This helped reduce excess inventory and improved service levels.
The scope of the project included demand inputs, inventory planning, BOM explosion, capacity checks, and purchase planning across multiple manufacturing locations. With Anaplan, the client achieved better visibility, faster planning cycles, and improved decision-making. It also allowed cross-functional collaboration between supply planners, procurement, and production teams.
Overall, Anaplan addressed key business challenges like manual errors, siloed data, and lack of agility in supply planning—resulting in a more resilient and responsive supply chain
Anaplan helped centralize and automate their planning process. The MPS model enabled planners to balance supply with demand using real-time data, while the MRP model calculated material requirements based on production plans, inventory levels, and lead times. This helped reduce excess inventory and improved service levels.
The scope of the project included demand inputs, inventory planning, BOM explosion, capacity checks, and purchase planning across multiple manufacturing locations. With Anaplan, the client achieved better visibility, faster planning cycles, and improved decision-making. It also allowed cross-functional collaboration between supply planners, procurement, and production teams.
Overall, Anaplan addressed key business challenges like manual errors, siloed data, and lack of agility in supply planning—resulting in a more resilient and responsive supply chain
Pros
- Scenario planning
- Connected planning since on a single platform, you can build any process/use case
- single source of truth & real-time data sharing
- unify data collection, analyzing & reporting
Cons
- Limits of workspace or model size
- concurrency issue arises when multiple users are active
- since most of the formulas are excel equivalent, would like to see more functions coming in
- as models grow (e.g., millions of cells or complex hierarchies), calculation time slows significantly
- Reduced time for planning cycles, reduced monthly planning time from weeks to days through automation and centralized models.
- Planners spend more time on planning rather than consolidating reports for planning
- All data resides in one place & everyone referring to single source of truth hence data accuracy
- Increased Visibility & Transparency, leadership has better visibility into plans, assumptions, and variances for quicker decision-making.
Anaplan is a cloud-native, in-memory platform built specifically for enterprise performance management and connected planning. It allows users to easily build, modify, and maintain planning models without deep technical knowledge. Its no-code interface and real-time calculation engine enable fast scenario planning, cross-functional collaboration, and high user adoption. Anaplan is particularly well-suited for business-driven planning use cases, such as sales forecasting, supply planning, financial planning, and workforce planning.
In contrast, SAP APO and IBP are more structured, ERP-centric planning solutions deeply integrated with the SAP ecosystem. They follow a more rigid data model and require technical expertise to configure and maintain. SAP tools are often favored for operational planning at a transactional level, such as demand sensing, inventory optimization, or production scheduling, and are typically better suited for handling large volumes of ERP-level data.
While SAP focuses more on supply chain execution and integration, Anaplan emphasizes agility, usability, and rapid deployment for strategic and tactical planning. Organizations often use Anaplan to complement SAP by enabling more responsive, business-owned planning processes outside the core ERP environment.
In contrast, SAP APO and IBP are more structured, ERP-centric planning solutions deeply integrated with the SAP ecosystem. They follow a more rigid data model and require technical expertise to configure and maintain. SAP tools are often favored for operational planning at a transactional level, such as demand sensing, inventory optimization, or production scheduling, and are typically better suited for handling large volumes of ERP-level data.
While SAP focuses more on supply chain execution and integration, Anaplan emphasizes agility, usability, and rapid deployment for strategic and tactical planning. Organizations often use Anaplan to complement SAP by enabling more responsive, business-owned planning processes outside the core ERP environment.
Do you think Anaplan delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Anaplan's feature set?
Yes
Did Anaplan live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Anaplan go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Anaplan again?
Yes
Anaplan Feature Ratings
Using Anaplan
10 - all process related to supply chain planning
Anaplan Training
Anaplan Support
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Quick Resolution Knowledgeable team Kept well informed Immediate help available Support understands my problem Support cares about my success Quick Initial Response | None |
The decision to purchase premium support for Anaplan was not within my responsibility, so I wasn’t directly involved in that process.
Yes - There was one particular bug we reported where the issue was transferred between different teams on the Anaplan side, and by the time it was resolved, the situation had already moved past its critical point. However, this has only happened once or twice. For the most part, the support team has been very active and quick in resolving issues, which we really appreciate.
One memorable instance of exceptional support from Anaplan was when a model builder accidentally deleted an important model. We reached out to the support team, and they responded swiftly and efficiently. Thanks to their quick action and expertise, the deleted model was restored promptly, minimizing disruption to our operations. Their responsiveness and ability to resolve such a critical issue made a strong positive impression on us.
Using Anaplan
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using | None |
- Model building and customization: Intuitive interface for creating and modifying complex models without heavy coding
- Dashboard creation: User-friendly drag-and-drop tools for building insightful, interactive dashboards.
- drill down functionality, you can trace entire path of how the output arrived
- Handling very large datasets: Performance can slow down when working with extremely large or highly granular data models
- User interface customization: Limited options for UI customization beyond standard dashboards may restrict tailored user experiences.
Yes, but I don't use it

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation