Good on its own, but avoid if you need Secure Equipment Access.
August 06, 2025
Good on its own, but avoid if you need Secure Equipment Access.

Score 1 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Software Version
IR 500 Series
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Catalyst IR1100 Rugged Series Routers
We were sold this item over an FTD, being told that Secure Equipment Access would be the better way to go over VPN. But has been an uphill battle that took nearly a year and a half before we could even get this thing implemented, and then another year before Cisco would update things enough to give us MFA options.
Pros
- reliability in harsh environments
- flexibly power options
Cons
- useability outside SEA
- Cisco CDO integration
- eliminate the need for zone based routing to function with SEA.
- Horrible impact to business because the need to be deployed with SEA
- functioning strictly as a router it has been reliable in a very hard environment.
This product is brought down by the requirement of Secure Equipment Access to have the ability to address our problem in our environment. If Secure Equipment Access was not a part of our deployment, I think this would have been a solid and cost-effective solution to a controls DMZ router. I do how ever wish that it had the same CyberVision possibilities as the IE3300 switches.
Do you think Cisco Catalyst IR1100 Rugged Series Routers delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco Catalyst IR1100 Rugged Series Routers's feature set?
No
Did Cisco Catalyst IR1100 Rugged Series Routers live up to sales and marketing promises?
No
Did implementation of Cisco Catalyst IR1100 Rugged Series Routers go as expected?
No
Would you buy Cisco Catalyst IR1100 Rugged Series Routers again?
No
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation