Cisco SD-WAN review after 3 projects
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco SD-WAN
Multiple wan lines to branches, dynamic steering, single dashboard for config and mgmt, cloud on-ramp for better cloud integration.
Pros
- Upgrades
- Wan steering and metric reporting
- Easier design because app aware routing etc.
- Simplify mgmt
Cons
- Config history (git like)
- Readability and quality of the main dashboard
- More clearly indicate resource/hw requirements when wanting to activate services
- Cisco iOS-xe in controller mode is seriously hampered. Stp didn’t arrive until 17.4/17.5 code and streaming telemetry is still impossible.
- Centralized mgmt and dashboard
- Better metrics visibility (compared to classic snmp)
- It helps deal with specific designs (hub with point2point and a neighboring hub with point2multipoint makes for awkward qos)
- Absolutely the visibility on the isp performance. All of a sudden the issues became very apparent and we came up with plans to deal with it.
- An upside is that it runs still on current gen hardware such as isr4k. It helps the sell to clients that aren’t yet at the end of their hw lifecycle
- General i feel the cost is decent with the controllers etc. One downside is smaller clients have limitations in the number or cloud controllers they can have, which matters with global deployments.
Do you think Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN's feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation