Powerful, simple feature flagging
Overall Satisfaction with ConfigCat
We use ConfigCat to separate our deployments from our releases and to manage configuration for our clients. We also use it to de-risk our deployments, especially when there is a performance risk. It makes QA and testing simpler as QA is in charge of what is turned on/off). It has unlimited environments and seats, so we can comprehensively cover all of our many personas within the organization. The ConfigCat team is super helpful and responsive. There are many SDKs available and nice extensions. I am very happy we chose ConfigCat over the competitors.
Pros
- Feature flagging(!!)
- Environment Set up
- Support
- High performance at scale
Cons
- Could use a React SDK
- Having the Pro tier be more usable for normal Saas organizations by offering more environments.
- Feature Flagging
- Price
- Flexibility
- Faster, more frequent delivery to customers
- Faster ROI
- Better Quality and control of our software
- Better iteration and product development - fits very well with agile methodologies
ConfigCat was cheaper and the support is better.
Do you think ConfigCat delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with ConfigCat's feature set?
Yes
Did ConfigCat live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of ConfigCat go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy ConfigCat again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation