Best assessment tool for identifying QA Engineers
July 07, 2020
Best assessment tool for identifying QA Engineers
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with EYardstick
Introduction of pre-employment assessments as a precursor before actual interviews is surprisingly making us talk to almost perfect fits. There are two things we observed, one is the knowledge and skill of the candidate and also his seriousness as he is spending around 90 minutes for a test.
- Coding simulators with pre-built questions for many roles.
- Wide variety of topics in software testing space.
- Availability of questions on niche topics like BDD, Cucumber, etc.
- Reporting and analytics module can include more detailed reports.
- UI should be customisable to meet the company's branding colors.
- Some of the topics can have more questions in their database.
- Great value for money.
- It only takes approx $3 for amazing results.
Availability of a lot of features made the prior product look clobbered and there was a learning curve for new leads who joined the team. Also, the pricing in EYardstick is flat and transparent, with our old tool adding an extra feature like coding combined with MCQ was being charged differently than just coding.
Do you think EYardstick delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with EYardstick's feature set?
Yes
Did EYardstick live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of EYardstick go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy EYardstick again?
Yes