IBM Clinical Development Review
February 04, 2021

IBM Clinical Development Review

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with IBM Clinical Development (ICD)

ICD is used by Data Management Department, CRA Department and project manager might also have experience with IBM CD. From designer's perspective, ICD has very strong Dynamic functions. It is also very user friendly. However, some function can not be implemented. For example, format of subject ID is limited, some edit check cannot be done with simple / advance way. For advance editor, if logic is too complex, it takes time to pull elements from functional pane.
  • Very good dynamic system. Avoid site to see information unnecessary.
  • User friendly. No need to have strong programming background.
  • Study customized system setting.
  • Wish Advanced Editor can be both manually edited and pull the elements
  • Consider more possibility of Subject ID
  • System setting document can not import study attributes
  • Cannot add repeating cycle X if my memory is correct
  • Time savings
  • Easy to train
ICD system runs faster, easier to use.
Exist functions are very good to use, but need to add more functions.
Feedback from customer support is timely. Also, effective advices were provided.

Do you think Merative Clinical Development delivers good value for the price?

Not sure

Are you happy with Merative Clinical Development's feature set?


Did Merative Clinical Development live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of Merative Clinical Development go as expected?


Would you buy Merative Clinical Development again?


Stage I and Stage IV study require less complex edit check.
Study with less cycles or cohorts.