IBM MQ user experience review.
Overall Satisfaction with IBM MQ
IBM MQ is used as an Enterprise Messaging platform in a Banking organization to ensure message integrity and flow consistency. It deals with challenges such as long-running transactions, message tracking, performance, and authentication/authorization issues. Working with IBM MQ for many years in heterogeneous environments, the platform has proven to be robust, with huge integration capabilities through the variety of APIs provided.
Pros
- MQ client application authentication and authorization.
- MQ message integrity.
- MQ integration with other product suites such as: IBM Websphere Application Server, Delinea Secrets PAM server, etc.
- MQ error logging mechanism.
- MQ APIs for .NET, Java,... based application codes.
Cons
- MQ message tracking in cases of no commit or roll-back.
- MQ integration with cloud based apps optimization.
- MQ message data handling for testing purposes (successor of RFHUtil).
- Messaging flow & delivery stability.
- Message integrity.
- Secure authentication and authorization for accessing MQ resources (channels, queues).
IBM MQ meets enterprise messaging business needs in terms of platform stability, functionality, support, and the list of APIs provided for client app integration, while Rabbit MQ is not an enterprise messaging platform but rather an open-source broker for point-to-point messaging.
Do you think IBM MQ delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with IBM MQ's feature set?
Yes
Did IBM MQ live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of IBM MQ go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy IBM MQ again?
Yes
Using IBM MQ
100 - Payments, cards, dealing room, credit risk
2 - MQ certified - Senior MQ admins

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation