Testing Process & Management Enforcer
Overall Satisfaction with IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
My Department "Quality Department" uses IBM Rational Quality Manager as the main system that holds everything related to Quality like Test Cases, Test Plans, Test Suites, Execution Records, etc. The Application has a lot of features and helped us keep track of all testing activities conducted through different projects across the organization. We keep all of our testing artifacts on it as well.
Pros
- Test Cases Management
- Test Execution Management
- Seamless Integration with IBM RTC and IBM RM
Cons
- User Interface and User Experience needs to be Improved
- No Defect Management
- Integration with Automated Scripts needs to be easier
- Some features depend on IBM RTC
- Test Cases Management
- Test Execution Results Management
- Test Plans Management
- Better Management of Testing Artifacts
- Helped us enforce Testing Process
- Helped us in keeping track of Test Execution Results for each Build
We have used TestLink before using IBM Rational Quality Manager and there is no comparison between them as TestLink will lose in every aspect against IBM Rational Quality Manager. I think it was a very good decision to migrate to it instead of TestLink despite the problems in the User Experience.
Do you think IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management's feature set?
Yes
Did IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation