IBM Storage FlashSystem SVC Family
Overall Satisfaction with IBM Storage FlashSystem
we use the IBM Storage FlashSystem's Virtual Storage (SVC) backend to support critical production workload as well as regular production. Even we are mirroring the production volumes between the two data centers (approc 35kM apart), we got an excellent response time. Less than 0.5ms for reading and approx. 1.0ms for writing. The environment is very stable and we were able to continue production even we lost one of the two 9500 controllers. Almost nobody notices the event.
Pros
- Stable
- Good compression rate
- Same interface for all the family (SVC & Flash systems)
Cons
- Migration from directly attached host to SVC
- Stable and performance
GUI and CLI common the whole family (SVC & FlashSystems)
I can support more workload with good performance even with compression
Do you think IBM Storage FlashSystem delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with IBM Storage FlashSystem's feature set?
Yes
Did IBM Storage FlashSystem live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of IBM Storage FlashSystem go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy IBM Storage FlashSystem again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation