Overall Satisfaction with Panzura
We purchased Panzura to alleviate the issue of high latency between different sites for an engineering firm. We completely replaced our file storage at each site with caching servers instead and it is being utilized by the entire company. We found cost savings in not having large amounts of redundant storage at each location and instead using Azure Blob Storage.
- File caching.
- Data usage metrics.
- Cost savings.
- More flexibility in platforms to run on.
- More support for high IO applications like arcMap.
- Huge increase in collaboration.
- Cheaper to maintain and purchase than traditional file servers.
We looked at Talon but had better initial discussions with Panzura. We also looked at DFS Replication but at hundreds of TB of data it was not nearly as cost effective. Panzura had more experience with engineering applications and the complexities that were involved in certain ways apps wrote and read data.
Do you think Panzura CloudFS delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Panzura CloudFS's feature set?
Yes
Did Panzura CloudFS live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Panzura CloudFS go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Panzura CloudFS again?
Yes