Evaluate of Portainer
Overall Satisfaction with Portainer
Portainer it's used to solve personal cases of development with docker containers.
Pros
- easy control
- all container accesses
- allow administration of network, images, volumes
Cons
- Lack of granular RBAC control: While Portainer does have role-based access control (RBAC) features, they are not as granular as some users would like. Some users have reported that they would like to have more control over permissions for individual users or groups. This would enable more fine-grained control over who has access to which containers or clusters.
- Limited support for non-Docker container technologies: While Portainer is primarily designed to manage Docker containers, it does have some limited support for other container technologies like Kubernetes and Docker Swarm. However, this support is not as robust as it is for Docker, and some users have reported that they would like to see better support for other container technologies.
- Limited control over container networking: Portainer's networking features are somewhat limited compared to other container management tools. Some users have reported that they would like more control over container networking, including the ability to create custom networks and control IP addresses.
- User-friendly interface: Portainer's user-friendly interface makes it easy to manage and monitor containers, images, networks, and volumes.
- Multi-Platform Support: Portainer supports Docker, Docker Swarm, Kubernetes, and other container technologies, which makes it a versatile tool for managing container environments.
- Increased productivity: Portainer's user-friendly interface and streamlined container management can help increase the productivity of IT teams.
- Cost savings: By simplifying container management, Portainer can help reduce the time and resources required to manage container environments, potentially leading to cost savings.
- SUSE Rancher and Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)
Portainer vs. Rancher: Portainer and Rancher are both popular container management platforms that support Docker and Kubernetes. However, Rancher provides more advanced features such as multi-cluster management and native support for Istio, a popular service mesh technology. Portainer, on the other hand, is known for its user-friendly interface and ease of use.Portainer vs. Kubernetes Dashboard: Kubernetes Dashboard is a web-based interface for managing Kubernetes clusters, while Portainer supports Docker, Docker Swarm, and Kubernetes. While Kubernetes Dashboard provides a more robust set of features for Kubernetes management, Portainer provides a more user-friendly interface and a simpler overall experience.
Do you think Portainer delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Portainer's feature set?
Yes
Did Portainer live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Portainer go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Portainer again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation