TrustRadius
Super fast and easy to integrate
https://www.trustradius.com/nosql-databasesRedisUnspecified9.1173101
Anush Ramani profile photo
September 07, 2019

Super fast and easy to integrate

Score 9 out of 101
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source

Overall Satisfaction with Redis

We currently use Redis in only one core internal application, however, this application handles around 90% of our company's internet traffic. This application load balances requests intelligently across multiple downstream server clusters. Prior to this, we used to frequently run into bottlenecks at the DB layer when web server scaling alone was insufficient.

The great thing about this is also that each cluster can be running a different version of our application allowing us to maintain a high level of robustness for our larger enterprise customers, while also allowing us to deploy frequently to other clusters that want the bleeding edge. With Redis, being able to determine the right cluster for the right request happens blazing fast.
  • FAST LOOKUPS. First and foremost, this is the bread and butter of Redis. It is our go-to for any highly performant lookups.
  • SCALE OUT. Helps build distributed applications that need to share data across geographies.
  • Better GUI clients. At the time of adoption, the choices for UI based clients were poor. Such tools are necessary for tier 1 support personnel who may not be entirely technically savvy.
  • We use Redis for the purposes of routing data within our infrastructure. In this use case, we want there to be a little additional latency as possible. In this, Redis does a great job.
We primarily use the traditional Redis simple key-value pairs. Speed and stability are what we rely on Redis for. In this aspect, we have seen exceptional performance and uptime in all the applications we use Redis in.
  • Price
  • Product Reputation
Industry adoption was the most important factors in deciding to go with Redis. The options really boiled down to a choice between Redis and Memcached. We tried both and found that support for Redis was far superior to Memcached in terms of hosting and maintenance. Redis was also gaining more traction in the dev community, so the choice became pretty clear.
While we don't really have much to compare with since we chose Redis off the bat for the purpose we're using it for, I can say that implementing it in our application was quite seamless.
We initially tried ElastiCache with Redis hosting. While it did the job of running Redis, we still had to deal with server sizing. We switched to Redis Cloud since that had auto-scaling and easy to use tools.
I would highly recommend Redis as a hosted solution. We tried self-hosting initially but gave up on that due to the overhead of maintenance. We really want to use Redis in mission-critical projects and as such, reliability is paramount. Self-hosting leads to concerns with reliability—that's best left to services for whom that is their bread and butter.

Redis Feature Ratings

Performance
10
Availability
10
Concurrency
10
Security
1
Scalability
10
Data model flexibility
Not Rated
Deployment model flexibility
Not Rated