My experience using Veracode tool
Overall Satisfaction with Veracode
I have been using Veracode for nearly 2 years, we are using its SAST and DAST features. Previously there was no source code validation in our software development life cycle. We used this tool to shift the security to left, and tried to make the process as automate as possible. The best use case of this tool is that it can be fit anywhere with flexible plugins at different stages of SDLC. Even the support is very good and co-operative.
Pros
- Veracode does integrate into IDE where the development starts. IDE Scans will help in reducing the versions of code.
- The best thing about Veracode is, that it is a SAAS platform, and we can run the scan and do our other work parallelly.
- Veracode dynamic analysis is pretty good as it clearly shows the requests it sends to the server and the response it receives from the server. Which helps in analyzing the vulnerabilities more easily.
Cons
- Reporting work can be improved.
- I am a senior security engineer, I could not give you the numbers, but I can see the difference before Veracode and after Veracode into the business.
I would say to diversify the solutions through multiple vendors, depending on the project needs.
Report inside the tool is the best, but report to send to the respective stakeholder such as developers could be better.
At Development IDE, at CI/CD pipelines, post deployment as well.
- SonarQube, Qualys VMDR and JFrog Security (Xray)
Do you think Veracode delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Veracode's feature set?
Yes
Did Veracode live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Veracode go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Veracode again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation