Simple to use
December 06, 2019
Simple to use
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Windows Server Failover Clustering
We use failover clustering to provide an active-passive failover for VMs hosted on 2 physical servers. The VMs server both are public-facing websites and our internal CRM so completely mission-critical to the entire business for continuity. This gives us the redundancy and the ability to keep things going when constantly updating windows! WFC has some very advanced features but our needs are fairly simple and this works really well for us.
Pros
- Redundancy - We can spead the VMs that we use across 2 physical servers, but should one go down it all switches to the working one.
- Spread the load - We can assign preferred servers for the VMs to run on so when they are available the VMs can be set to run on specific hardware.
Cons
- Has a pretty steep learning curve.
- Can be a lot of hoops to jump through to get up and running.
- Easy to missing settings buried in the GUI.
- Minimized loss of access to mission critical applications.
- Has been the cause of 1 though where the failover didn't happen, had to force the active VM to off to make the fail over happen.
Only ever used WFC so cannot speak of other technologies or alternatives. As mentioned we're a Microsoft tech house and its included int he server OS so it just makes sense to use it.
Do you think Windows Server Failover Clustering delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Windows Server Failover Clustering's feature set?
Yes
Did Windows Server Failover Clustering live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Windows Server Failover Clustering go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Windows Server Failover Clustering again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation