Overview
What is BrowserStack?
BrowserStack is a test platform built for developers and QAs to expand test coverage, scale and optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability. BrowserStack states it currently powers over a billion tests…
BrowserStack: The Swiss Army Knife of Web Testing!
great tool , reduces time and cost
Great product that helped us ship faster
BrowserStack - A Great Testing tool that make QA life easier
A really useful tool. They provide a great support on pre-sale and post-sales
We have limited devices for running …
BrowserStack Review
While using the BrowserStack we solve one of …
BrowserStack reviewed by Test Manager
TLDR: Positive experience, positive review. (compatibility heavy).
Best option for mobile tests
Seamless Cross-Browser Compatibility Testing Tool
A solid product for those in need of automation and MORE devices
Browserstack: Bridging the Device Gap, Elevating Testing with Cloud Device Farm
Like Percy, but it could have features to deliver a better developer experience
Forget getting your own devices
Awards
Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards
Reviewer Pros & Cons
Pricing
Percy - Free
$0
App Percy - Free
$0
Test Observability - Unlimited Free
$0
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Product Demos
App Percy - Visual Testing for apps, simplified
Percy Demo | See Percy in action
Getting started with the BrowserStack SDK
Product Details
- About
- Integrations
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- FAQs
What is BrowserStack?
BrowserStack is test platform built for developers andQAs to expand test coverage, scale, and optimize testing. BrowserStack can be used by teams and organizations of all sizes - whether testing manually, starting test automation, or scaling automation.
BrowserStack states its customers include Amazon, Paypal, Well Fargo Bank, Nvidia, MongoDB, Pfizer, GE, Discovery, React JS, Apache, JQuery and several others who use BrowserStack to:
Expand test coverage with cross-browser, real device, accessibility, and visual testing.
Scale test automation with BrowserStack's leading cross-browser and real device cloud and test observability.
Centralise and scale testing processes with test management.
Unlock testing and quality insights.
BrowserStack Products:
Live - Manual cross-browser testing
App Live - Manual real-device testing
Automate - Browser automation grid
App Automate - Real device automation cloud
Percy - Automated visual testing and review
Low code automation - Test automation without coding
Accessibility Testing - Test WCAG and ADA compliance
Test Management - Unify and track all test cases
Test Observability - Test debugging and insights
BrowserStack Features
Automation Testing Features
- Supported: Record and Automate
- Supported: Multi-Browser Testing
- Supported: Mobile Testing
- Supported: Test Scheduling
- Supported: Test Management
- Supported: CI/CD Tool Integration
- Supported: Parallel Testing
- Supported: Object Recognition
- Supported: Data-Driven Testing
- Supported: Testing Collaboration
- Supported: Real Device Testing
- Supported: Testing Reports & Analytics
Additional Features
- Supported: Accessibility Testing
BrowserStack Screenshots
BrowserStack Integrations
BrowserStack Competitors
BrowserStack Technical Details
Deployment Types | Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based |
---|---|
Operating Systems | Unspecified |
Mobile Application | No |
Supported Countries | Global |
Supported Languages | English |
Frequently Asked Questions
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(338)Attribute Ratings
- 8Likelihood to Renew11 ratings
- 9.1Availability3 ratings
- 7.9Performance77 ratings
- 8.9Usability17 ratings
- 7.3Support Rating19 ratings
- 7.7Online Training2 ratings
- 7.3In-Person Training1 rating
- 9.1Implementation Rating4 ratings
- 7.8Configurability3 ratings
- 8.4Product Scalability3 ratings
- 8.2Ease of integration1 rating
- 8.5Vendor pre-sale2 ratings
- 8.5Vendor post-sale2 ratings
- 4Professional Services2 ratings
- 4.6Contract Terms and Pricing Model2 ratings
Reviews
(1-5 of 5)Forget getting your own devices
- No need to get own devices on premise
- Better API documentation
- Device availability for multiple users
- App Live
- App Automate
Browserstack review
- automate simple browser tests
- able to test on the latest devices on the market
- able to record tests
- able to remember past devices used
- test multiple devices side by side for a more easier testing experience
- get devices used more in the east and far east
- It provides instant testing platform for developers and testers
- allows a comprehensive test of mobile applications and websites for businesses
- use of real life devices and software for testing
- improved the testing cycles speed
- wider test coverage
- faster software fixes and releases
- improved the productivity of both the developers and testing team
- both manual and automating tools available
- better integrations
Testing on the very latest devices.
- testing
- marketing
- sales
- able to test on the move
- test from any location
- test at any time
- use more automation tools
- Cloud Solutions
- Scalability
- Integration with Other Systems
- Ease of Use
- Implemented in-house
- time
- people working from home
- Online Training
- Cross browser testing
- instant access to the latest devices and software
- testing on real devices
- automation is harder to understand
- taking real user conditions into account
- Device Fragmentation
Good for cross browser testing and parrallel automation run
- parallel execution
- Many of platforms for testing
- Well integration with Selenium and Cypress
- Manual testing
- Easy to use and fast
- They can reduce the cost
- More flexible plans can be introduced
- Support team needs to be aware more technical things
- Parallel automation
- Cross-browser testing
- Manual testing
- Mobile testing
- Automation
- helpful in testing before final release
- It helps us a lot to test cross-browser when we had launch new UI
- reduce the time of execution as we can run 5 automation suites at a time
- reduce the cost of infrastructure, and VM's
We do bought many hardware for testing purpose before that, but now no need to spend on it.
- App Live
- Automate
- LambdaTest and Sauce Labs
- Mostly used for automation test execution
- then we do used for cross browser test execution
- and it has reduce the cost of infrastructure
- Cross-browser testing
- UX testing by design team
- parallel test execution of large number of test cases
- if it will be available in less cost
- and more flexible plans as per the requirement
- it will have similar feature of manual and automation testing
- Cloud Solutions
- Scalability
- Integration with Other Systems
- Ease of Use
- Other
- Implemented in-house
- Learning the browserstack tool and its usage
- integration with automation Selenium and cypress
- setting up capabilities inside automation scripts
- Online Training
- In-Person Training
1. Automation, 2. Parallel testing 3. CBT testing 4. Manual Testing 5 Dev and Design level testing
- Manual testing
- Cross browser testing
- Integration with other tools Selenium
- Available documentation
- Platform and capabilities selection for automation
- integration with cypress
- integration with Selenium
- File import/export
- Single Signon
- API (e.g. SOAP or REST)
- ETL tools
- App live testing by manual team
- parallel testing by automation
- cross-browser testing with available n number of platforms
- some AI integration for automation
- By cost, it should be more competitive
- Keep update latest browser versions as soon as
BrowserStack for Rapid Test Development
- Support/Helpdesk team is really helpful
- Precise documentation
- Availability of latest devices and platform
- Daily summary reports for our test project execution
- Documentation to be updated with latest versions of tools
- Support engineers for languages other than JAVA, Python (specifically ruby)
- Enterprise features to be available for usage - (IP / Location set for mobile)
- APP AUTOMATE
- OBJECT INSPECTOR
- ITS DOCUMENTATION
- faster release cycle
- quick bug identification even before stage
- faster execution of test cases
- parallel execution of test cases
- huge list of devices and platform availability
- Sauce Labs and Jenkins
- Mobile Test Case Automation
- Reducing Regression Testing Cycle
- Critical functionality Testing on Stage
- Reduce time and effort of Manual QA
- Finding bugs before Live
- Parallel execution of test scenarios reduced the execution cycle impressively
- Fusion of Browerstack queue feature usage with our in house framework re run capability
- Better reporting with screenshots
- App live for debugging
- Highly reusable components that runs independently in browserstack
- More parallels in lesser cost
- Device Geolocation feature
- Website testing in mobile devices
- Scalability
- Integration with Other Systems
- Ease of Use
- Other
- Don't know
- No such issues while implementation
- App Live - debugging and its usage
- App Automate - for Mobile automation development and execution from your own scripts
- Device testing
- Regression executions
- Glitches sometimes while debugging in app live
BrowserStack - Great for Mobile App Testing
Start - We are using browserstack for running our automation suite and also doing manual testing on Mobile App.
It helps us lot while doing testing within sprint and running regression within Release.
We are also planning to leverage for doing Mobile Performance testing which is great so far.
- Mobile Setup is really helpful
- Mobile Browser Support with in browserstack is fantastic
- Struggling with Image Injection which didn't work for us
- SMS Testing
Browser Support in Mobile & Desktop is great
Good Support team and respond quickly
- Mobile Setup
- Able to perform Mobile Tetsing within Sprint
- Able to perform regession testing within release
You can see why it is taking more time while doing testing on iphone
- Mobile App
- Mobile App Testing
- Iphone Performance Parameters
- Product Usability
- Implemented in-house
- Firewall Issues
- No Training
- Browser testing
- Percy Tool Integration
- Not integrated with ther
- Yes, I want to explore that area too
- API (e.g. SOAP or REST)
- FingerPrint Testing
- SMS Testing