3SL Cradle vs. OpenText ALM/Quality Center
3SL Cradle vs. OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
3SL Cradle | N/A | Cradle from UK company 3SL is an application requirements management platform. | $449 | |
OpenText ALM/Quality Center | N/A | OpenText™ ALM/Quality Center, formerly from Micro Focus, serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps users to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes. | N/A |
3SL Cradle | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
Additional Details | Please note that Cradle is licenced by fully floating concurrent module licences. So pricing will depend on your usage pattern. For example licencing for 10 engineers may require 7 REQ (Requirements Management) , only 2 SYS (Systems Engineering Modelling) and say 1 DASH (Dashboard analytics). Licences are only locked when that function is accessed, which means a large user base can have access to all functionality at a much low cost than usual pricing. That's why it's good to call. | — | ||||||||||||||
More Pricing Information |
3SL Cradle | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
---|---|---|
Top Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
Top Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
3SL Cradle | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
---|---|---|
Small Businesses | Polarion ALM Score 9.3 out of 10 | Polarion ALM Score 9.3 out of 10 |
Medium-sized Companies | Polarion ALM Score 9.3 out of 10 | Polarion ALM Score 9.3 out of 10 |
Enterprises | Polarion ALM Score 9.3 out of 10 | Polarion ALM Score 9.3 out of 10 |
All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
3SL Cradle | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | - (0 ratings) | 7.2 (31 ratings) |
Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (2 ratings) |
Usability | - (0 ratings) | 3.0 (2 ratings) |
Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 7.4 (2 ratings) |
Ease of integration | - (0 ratings) | 1.0 (1 ratings) |
3SL Cradle | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | 3SL No answers on this topic | OpenText |
Pros | 3SL No answers on this topic | OpenText |
Cons | 3SL No answers on this topic | OpenText |
Likelihood to Renew | 3SL No answers on this topic | OpenText |
Usability | 3SL No answers on this topic | OpenText |
Support Rating | 3SL No answers on this topic | OpenText |
Alternatives Considered | 3SL No answers on this topic | OpenText |
Return on Investment | 3SL No answers on this topic | OpenText |
ScreenShots | 3SL Cradle Screenshots |