Abriska 22301 vs. FloQast
Abriska 22301 vs. FloQast
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Abriska 22301 | N/A | Abriska 22301 was designed to support organisations conduct a BIA, which fully complies with the requirements of ISO 22301, the International Business Continuity Management Systems (BCMS) Standard. A key feature of Abriska is that it replaces multiple spreadsheets with a ‘single source of truth’ database. Users are able to enter information through a secure Web-based system, to simplify the BIA process. The relationship information can either be viewed via extracts or via the interactive… | N/A | |
FloQast | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | FloQast offers their financial close software to streamline accounting month end close, simply providing automation around reconciliation and eliminating human error, and visibility via a close status dashboard, as well as providing a complete audit trail. | N/A |
| Abriska 22301 | FloQast | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Required | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Abriska 22301 | FloQast |
|---|
| Abriska 22301 | FloQast | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consolidation and Close |
|
| Abriska 22301 | FloQast | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Tipalti Score 7.2 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | ManageEngine ADAudit Plus Score 9.1 out of 10 | Cube Score 9.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ManageEngine ADAudit Plus Score 9.1 out of 10 | OneStream Score 8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Abriska 22301 | FloQast | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - (0 ratings) | 8.8 (153 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 7.8 (7 ratings) |
| Usability | - (0 ratings) | 8.3 (6 ratings) |
| Availability | - (0 ratings) | 6.4 (4 ratings) |
| Performance | - (0 ratings) | 7.3 (3 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 9.3 (10 ratings) |
| In-Person Training | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (2 ratings) |
| Online Training | - (0 ratings) | 7.4 (2 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (3 ratings) |
| Configurability | - (0 ratings) | 7.3 (3 ratings) |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - (0 ratings) | 7.3 (1 ratings) |
| Ease of integration | - (0 ratings) | 7.3 (3 ratings) |
| Product Scalability | - (0 ratings) | 8.4 (4 ratings) |
| Vendor post-sale | - (0 ratings) | 7.3 (3 ratings) |
| Vendor pre-sale | - (0 ratings) | 7.3 (3 ratings) |
| Abriska 22301 | FloQast | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | URM Consultancy No answers on this topic | FloQast
|
| Pros | URM Consultancy No answers on this topic | FloQast
|
| Cons | URM Consultancy No answers on this topic | FloQast
|
| Likelihood to Renew | URM Consultancy No answers on this topic | FloQast
|
| Usability | URM Consultancy No answers on this topic | FloQast
|
| Reliability and Availability | URM Consultancy No answers on this topic | FloQast
|
| Performance | URM Consultancy No answers on this topic | FloQast
|
| Support Rating | URM Consultancy No answers on this topic | FloQast
|
| In-Person Training | URM Consultancy No answers on this topic | FloQast
|
| Online Training | URM Consultancy No answers on this topic | FloQast
|
| Implementation Rating | URM Consultancy No answers on this topic | FloQast
|
| Alternatives Considered | URM Consultancy No answers on this topic | FloQast
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | URM Consultancy No answers on this topic | FloQast
|
| Scalability | URM Consultancy No answers on this topic | FloQast
|
| Return on Investment | URM Consultancy No answers on this topic | FloQast
|
| ScreenShots | FloQast Screenshots |





