FloQast

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
FloQast
Score 9.1 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
FloQast offers their financial close software to streamline accounting month end close, simply providing automation around reconciliation and eliminating human error, and visibility via a close status dashboard, as well as providing a complete audit trail.N/A
Pricing
FloQast
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FloQast
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup FeeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FloQast
Considered Both Products
FloQast
Chose FloQast
FloQast offers more capabilities and a better user interface. Everything is centralized in one location and can be seen from an overall view. Being able to navigate throughout each period and finding whatever you need to find is convenient on FloQast as well. This is essential …
Chose FloQast
FloQast has a more robust preparer and reviewer signoff
Chose FloQast
Three of the main reasons we selected FloQast were the flexibility in the use of the software, the company's ongoing innovation, and the fact that our information stays on our SharePoint site, rather than on the audit software's server.
Chose FloQast
FloQast is easier to implement and more cost effective but not as robust or capable of a product.
Chose FloQast
I like FloQast a lot better, it has input with NetSuite that I think is easy to understand. We use Workiva for quarterly financial reporting, and might be useful to see what FloQast has to offer when it comes to that to prevent us from having to use another software
Chose FloQast
First time in industry so I've not used other similar tools.
Chose FloQast
It is cost effective and also the team from FloQast is very much supportive and are super active when we raise any ticket they resolve the issue as soon as possible. It is also user friendly like the other tools are complicate to set up and to understand but FloQast is easy to …
Chose FloQast
I used BlackLine at my previous job. Now I use FloQast at my current job. FloQast is, in my opinion, much easier to use than BlackLine and the looks and feels of the website are more user friendly and visually pleasing. BlackLine seemed like a separate system and was not …
Chose FloQast
Middle market approach that was a better fit for my company.
Chose FloQast
I used BlackLine a while ago with a different company and only for 3 months or so. From what I recall, it was fairly similar in functionality and service offering to what FQ offers. That was a good while ago, but I do like the layout and functionality in FQ. It didn't take long …
Chose FloQast
that was all manual, this keeps things in one central place and automatically syncs with our ERP
Chose FloQast
We started with BlackLine and after a year and limited adoption across the accounting team, changed to FloQast. We had numerous reasons, including difficulty in working with the BlackLine standard reconciliation, time needed to complete the set up for automatic reconciliation …
Chose FloQast
We use Netsuite for our main GL and reporting ERP. BlackLine was much more expensive and we went with FloQast.
Chose FloQast
Having FloQast automatically pulls updates from excel files saved in our shared folders is key instead of having to upload new files as we've done in the past with other comparable products
Chose FloQast
At the time we picked FloQast, they were the most cost effective and easiest tool to use. Fast forward a little bit, and Numeric has come to market. I really lie Numeric to be honest and feel that their pricing is better and for that lower pricing, they include more …
Chose FloQast
The User Interface and implementation were the key drivers for choosing FloQast compared to BlackLine.
Chose FloQast
Since it connects to our accounting software it has made the closing process much better than any other tools.
Chose FloQast
FloQast more than holds it own on pricing and is definitely a cut above in customer service and innovation.
Chose FloQast
The User Interface and implementation were the key drivers for choosing FQ compared to BL. Our team was up in a matter of days or so it felt! Even if you didn't get properly trained in FQ, you could easily figure it out on your own, which was nice, especially for a large team.
Chose FloQast
We found that FloQast fit well into our existing close process and made it much more efficient. Other rooms, such as BlackLine, required a longer and more costly implementation. It also required the use of their reconciliation formats. We did not see the value in that …
Chose FloQast
I used BlackLine many years ago but found it to be a waste of time. I didn't like being required to use the BlackLine format for reconciliations. The one size fits all mentality never quite works out when it comes to accounting - every business does things a little differently. …
Chose FloQast
Netgain has a product called NetClose which we've considered but ultimately went with FloQast because of simplicity and ease of use. The other product was more technical and hands on.
Chose FloQast
FloQast has a strong brand, offers excellent customer service, has a strong core product, and continues to improve and provide additional value to its customers.
Features
FloQast
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
7.9
126 Ratings
1% below category average
Financial data consolidation7.776 Ratings
Journal entries and reports8.756 Ratings
Multi-currency management4.739 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails9.592 Ratings
Customizable Workflows8.8106 Ratings
Best Alternatives
FloQast
Small Businesses
Tipalti
Tipalti
Score 7.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cube
Cube
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FloQast
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(153 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(7 ratings)
Usability
8.3
(6 ratings)
Availability
6.7
(4 ratings)
Performance
7.4
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
9.6
(10 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.1
(2 ratings)
Online Training
7.4
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(3 ratings)
Configurability
7.3
(3 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
7.3
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
7.4
(3 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.5
(4 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.4
(3 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
7.4
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
FloQast
Likelihood to Recommend
FloQast
I used another vendor for close management before, and comparing the two, FloQast is easier to use and the site navigation is much easier. The looks and feels of the site are more engaging and pleasant. As mentioned before in the previous question, their Journal Entry posting functionality is not suited for a company with multiple entities since it only allows you to book an entry when debits and credits are hitting the same entity
Read full review
Pros
FloQast
  • Provides a clear status of the month end close.
  • Allows us to analyze tasks by team member and reassign as needed.
  • It syncs with our ERP Netsuite to ensure balance sheet reconciliations can be tied out directly.
  • It also connects with Slack to notify users of key deadlines and changes in review status for team tasks.
Read full review
Cons
FloQast
  • A setting to allow for attachments to automatically be opened within the app (Adobe, Excel, etc.) rather than as a separate tab in the browser
  • Some of our tasks are quarterly or annual so assigning a very specific date would be helpful
  • Eliminate the need of "closing" review notes. Once we change the status to Resolved, that should be sufficient. Make Resolved and Closed one and the same
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
FloQast
It has proven to enhance our procedures with closing. It is an effective tool that I would recommend to create a more efficient closing procedure and get the team more aligned. It increases the accountability among the staff and helps to keep us on task and on time. It is easy to sign into and has reminder emails for tasks that are coming up or late.
Read full review
Usability
FloQast
FloQast is incredibly intuitive and easy to use. The only reason I don't give it a 10 is that the Flux Analysis feature is not great in terms of getting the information into the system. Once it's in, fantastic! But some work is needed
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
FloQast
We have only noticed a slight slow down in accessing FloQast on a couple of occasions (near the beginning of a month when many people were likely trying to get online to close their books). The issue has always resolved itself with three to five minutes, so it's never been a hinderance.
Read full review
Performance
FloQast
FloQast's performance is great. The pages always load quickly, and reports are completed fast! I've never noticed any slowdown in our ERP from the interface with FloQast.
Read full review
Support Rating
FloQast
They are rapid in their response. If they can't immediately offer a solution, they continue to keep in contact with you to let you know where they are in resolving your issues. The staff is friendly & speaks to you in layman's terms, not so high-tech that you can't understand
Read full review
In-Person Training
FloQast
The FloQast team members are just so personable. FloQast has clearly done a great job hiring people who are not just good at what they do, but are also fun to work with! They have placed people in the right roles and the customer benefits from this. I have enjoyed every opportunity I've had to work with a FloQast team member on training.
Read full review
Online Training
FloQast
The online training is good. But like all online, pre-recorded training, it is never quite as good as in-person or live training where one can ask questions or get clarification. That said, FloQast has an extensive training library and most of the time, if one finds they need help on a topic, it can be answered by going to the online training and watching appropriate recording.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
FloQast
Implementation occured before I started with the company (but despite the instruction to skip the question if I did not participate, the site required I put in a rating in order to move on to the next page)
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
FloQast
At the time we picked FloQast, they were the most cost effective and easiest tool to use. Fast forward a little bit, and Numeric has come to market. I really lie Numeric to be honest and feel that their pricing is better and for that lower pricing, they include more functions. However, we continued with FloQast for ease of continuity and my team is time strapped. What that said, FloQast is great - nothing wrong with it other than it could be cheaper.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
FloQast
I had no control over the contract
Read full review
Scalability
FloQast
We started using it with one client/customer and now use it with fourteen entities and plan to add two more in the next couple of months. It has made it possible to grow our business without hiring additional personnel. We can do more work with the same number of people
Read full review
Return on Investment
FloQast
  • Floqast has reduced our closing schedule by roughly 15-20% of the time it took us beforehand.
  • The product has been very beneficial for us during audit time when we can easily demonstrate our control workflows on reconciliation and task approvals.
  • I can update our CFO at any point in time how we are trending towards close and can coordinate with finance as to the moment journal entries have been completed
Read full review
ScreenShots

FloQast Screenshots

Screenshot of the analytics that displays progress throughout the closeScreenshot of flux analysisScreenshot of reconciliations