TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about Tricentis NeoLoad

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

Tricentis

Connect with Tricentis

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with Tricentis so that Tricentis and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    ACCELQ

    Score7.7 out of 10
    N/AACCELQ is an agile quality management platform that helps users achieve continuous delivery for web, mobile, manual testing, and APIs. It can be used to write and manage manual test cases for the functionality that may be too fluid for automation.N/A

    BlazeMeter

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AThe BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform is a unified, end-to-end, next-generation software test automation platform built for both Agile and COE teams, from Perforce. BlazeMeter includes complete continuous testing capabilities deeply integrated into a single, intuitive workflow.

    $199

    per month

    Tricentis NeoLoad

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/ATricentis NeoLoad is a solution for continuous performance testing software to automate API and application load testing. It was developed by the French company Neotys and acquired by Tricentis, along with the company, in March 2021.

    $20,000

    per year with 300 virtual users

    Pricing
    ACCELQBlazeMeterTricentis NeoLoad
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Basic
    $149.00
    per month
    Pro
    $649.00
    per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ACCELQBlazeMeterTricentis NeoLoad
    Free Trial
    YesNoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    ACCELQBlazeMeterTricentis NeoLoad
    Considered Multiple Products
    ACCELQ
    No answer on this topic
    Perforce Software
    No answer on this topic
    Tricentis
    Chose Tricentis NeoLoad
    in upper middle field
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Would buy again
    26 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    25 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    93%
    Happy with the feature set
    25 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    18 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Implementation went as expected
    23 Answers
    Features
    ACCELQBlazeMeterTricentis NeoLoad
    Automation Testing
    Comparison of Automation Testing features of ACCELQ and BlazeMeter and Tricentis NeoLoad
    Feature
    ACCELQ
    8.9
    1 Ratings
    5% above category average
    BlazeMeter
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Tricentis NeoLoad
    -
    Ratings
    Record and Automate9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multi-Browser Testing8.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Testing8.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Test Scheduling10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Test Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    CI/CD Tool Integration8.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrated Version Control10.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Parallel Testing10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Object Recognition10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data-Driven Testing9.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Testing Collaboration7.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Real Device Testing10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Testing Reports & Analytics9.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    ACCELQBlazeMeterTricentis NeoLoad
    Small Businesses
    BrowserStack
    Score8.5 out of 10
    BrowserStack
    Score8.5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    BlazeMeter
    Score8 out of 10
    BrowserStack
    Score8.5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    ACCELQBlazeMeterTricentis NeoLoad
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (5 ratings)
    7.6
    (33 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.5
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (4 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    3.6
    (4 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    ACCELQBlazeMeterTricentis NeoLoad
    Likelihood to Recommend
    ACCELQ
    Low code test automation, Ready to pickup platform without having much prior knowledge on automation, AI agent interactions are nearly close to real life scenarios, best API automation scale it has got, QGPT logic builder has really changed the talk with DBs in AI way, Logic insights feature is really impressive to identify possible risk while just started developing web apps.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Perforce Software
    It is well suited for applications that are mission-critical or applications that can receive high traffic/transactions at unscheduled time periods. Using the load testing feature of BlazeMeter, we can test and ascertain the capacity of the application without the drawbacks of the usual Apache JMeter load testing which depends heavily on the host system from where the load testing is performed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    While Tricentis NeoLoad supports SAP GUI protocols, recording and maintaining test scripts for complex SAP transactions (like those in the OTC module) can be cumbersome.


    For instance, we had challenges recording a VA01 (Sales Order Creation) transaction because of the dynamic nature of SAP screen fields and session handling. NeoLoad sometimes struggles to properly correlate or handle SAP’s SAPGUI Dynpro fields automatically.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    ACCELQ
    • Scriptless and hence coding is easy.
    • Maintenance of the scripts are easy.
    • Learning curve is small.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Perforce Software
    • BlazeMeter takes the .jmx script that teams had written for JMeter. The transition from JMeter to BlazeMeter was seamless.
    • BlazeMeter offers its own cloud and hence we did not have to set it up on-premise.
    • BlazeMeter hits our application from various geographic locations that simulates real life users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    • With Tricentis NeoLoad, we have control on the test dynamically. One can alter user count/volume even when test is in progress. This makes it a very cool tool as you can avoid running multiple tests eventually saves a lot of time.
    • Tricentis NeoLoad user paths are very well structured. End points can be identified and tweaked easily especially when a large list of endpoints are part of the neoload project.
    • Tricentis NeoLoad results comparison is one of the cool options. We can compare previous tests against the current one to see the exact delta between transaction metrics. This helps in gauging the application behaviour with changes deployed
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    ACCELQ
    • Visual regression features
    • Test generation from UI and UX platforms like Figma
    • Manual test tools can be more integrated with AutoPilot
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Perforce Software
    • Blazemeter reporting is very basic and shallow. There is no way to drill down or correlate. I can get better reports by using JMeter for free.
    • Blazemeter is very costly. Testing with volumes of more than 1K cu is expensive, and can be done for much cheaper if a company/team is willing to invest a bit of time to figure out how to use cloud instances and jmeter slaves, and to write a basic script to collect resulting xml output.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    • Ease of use: Some users find certain features or aspects of the interface to be confusing or hard to use. Improving the overall usability of the tool could make it more accessible and easier for users to get up and running with it.
    • Integration with other tools: Tricentis NeoLoad does not have many integrations with other tools. Adding more integrations with popular tools and platforms could make it easier for users to work with Tricentis NeoLoad as part of their overall workflow.
    • Mobile testing: Some users wish that Tricentis NeoLoad had more robust support for testing the performance of mobile applications. This could include the ability to simulate different mobile devices and networks, as well as the ability to test the performance of native mobile apps.
    • Cloud support: Tricentis NeoLoad does not have as much support for cloud-based applications and infrastructure. Adding more support for testing the performance of applications hosted in the cloud could be a useful feature for some users.
    • Advanced scripting capabilities: While Tricentis NeoLoad does offer some scripting capabilities, it would be nice to have more advanced options for customizing and automating load testing scenarios. Adding more advanced scripting capabilities could make it easier for users to create complex load testing scenarios.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    ACCELQ
    No answers on this topic
    Perforce Software
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    We find NeoLoad easy to use compared to their competitors. It requires minimal coding knowledge, also it is easy to train newcomers with NeoLoad. It also offers good integration and automation capability where with less code you can automate your testing process
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    ACCELQ
    Features like low code, API automation, auto pilot and free account creations, case studies are better suited for my business into IOT space, some of the enterprise automation features are truly game changer in productivity for my team. Database migration was supported seamlessly while opted for ACCELQ solutions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Perforce Software
    Easy to setup to do API Performance Testing. Dashboard to showcase results Capability to showcase runtime results
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    In being flexible to meet all needs, it is very bare bones by design, but this could be a considered a feature and not a bug.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    ACCELQ
    No answers on this topic
    Perforce Software
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    This is the only area where we strongly feel Tricentis needs to improve. Their support process is inadequate, representatives are not so capable of providing solutions at one shot without consulting their internal engineering teams. Most importantly, the time they take to resolve simple issues is huge and at many times hampered our work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    ACCELQ
    No answers on this topic
    Perforce Software
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    1. Their documentation is scattered over many places like GitHub read me files, their internal website etc;
    2. Support team takes huge time just to acknowledge our ticket
    3. No support to automatically migrate scripts from competetor tool into
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    ACCELQ
    When we implemented ACCELQ, we conducted POCs with many similar solutions. Among the tools we pursued at that time, accelQ stood out against Tricentis Tosca and QMetry automation studio. However, subject 7 did better. However, they were still in the nascent stages of building the tool, and hence we did not pick it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Perforce Software
    In comparison with Blazemeter the closes competitor is JMeter but it has disadvantages like it is not a tool that can be use as a collaborative tool and works locally in a computer, Blazemeter is in the web so different people can access and run tests or collaborate do add, edit or delete the existent scripts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    When we used Apache JMeter we faced some problems like less documentation is available for integrating tools, and some integrations have not yet been deployed. Very few plugin updates are made. Since customer support is an open source tool, it is a major problem. While Tricentis Neoload provides better documentations and customer services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    ACCELQ
    • Overall adoption of an automation tool went up.
    • Migration of existing selenium scripts to ACCELQ was relatively easy and less effort.
    • Lack of overall admin console and hence managing the agents across different execution is difficult.
    • Integration between accelQ and any test management tool can be difficult and buggy in most cases, even though it can be coded.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Perforce Software
    • It helped positively by helping to identify the maximum capacity needed for high traffic periods
    • Saved revenue by eliminating unwanted duplication of systems
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    • Performance testing is like an insurance. An online store which is not available causes a loss of sales. Without a performance test you do not know if it might happen. The invest into performance tests reduces the risk of loosing sales. The flexible license model of NeoLoad allows or customers to choose reasonable and suiteable rate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Tricentis NeoLoad Screenshots

    Screenshot of Code-less design — loops, conditions, and other drag and drop controls simplify test design creation, and JavaScript can still be used for extremely advanced cases.Screenshot of CI/CD integrations — collaborate across dev, QA, operations, and business teams to create a standardized performance testing approach throughout the enterprise.Screenshot of Real-time test results — analyze test results live to react to an anomaly before the test is over. And leverage in-depth test reporting when the test is completed.Screenshot of Collaborate on test result as the test is runningScreenshot of Configure SaaS-based performance testScreenshot of Dashboard for team analysis