Accenture vs. Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response

Accenture is well suited for undertaking projects that are a bit more complex and complicated. Because of their lineup, they are better suited to tackle those projects. Accenture may not be well suited for support on the basis of cost.

Incentivized

[Artic Wolf SOC-as-a-Service is] great if you don't have a large team nor the time to look at all the systems in your network. They monitor 24x7x365 taking that burden away from a reduced IT team.

Incentivized

• Accenture is processing oriented.
• Accenture has qualified consultants to help diagnose and remedy business problems.
• Accenture has a very good service delivery system and personnel.

Incentivized

• Monitoring 365 logins
• Monitoring Windows processes
• Active Directory monitoring

Incentivized

• Accenture may improve on the TAT for project documentation
• There is some room of improvement in the budget estimation which sometimes is vague. Having said that, they are very competitive in the market.

Incentivized

• Too many independent dashboards to look at (they are working on consolidating)

Incentivized

What differentiates them are their strong end-to-end capabilities. They have all sorts of resources, from Strategy/Management Consulting to deep Technical IT, going also through the new Digital Era. They are very complete and mature in the market, with the ability to deliver all types of projects with quality and according to the agreed budget and timeline.

Incentivized

Different product and covers the gaps our other products do not address. CheckPoint does not offer the same security monitoring on emails and AD accounts. Ninja One is used mainly as an RMM. Arctic Wolf is just another layer of security with detailed reports and options our other products do not have.

Incentivized

• I have been informed about Zero days prior to vendors releasing information to the public which has allowed me to patch in advanced of the general release of the information

Incentivized