22 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7.9 out of 100
4 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 5 out of 100

Feature Set Ratings

  • CA Scheduler Job Management ranks higher in 1 feature set: Workload Automation

Workload Automation

7.1

ActiveBatch Workload Automation

71%
8.0

CA Scheduler Job Management

80%
ActiveBatch Workload Automation ranks higher in 6/6 features

Multi-platform scheduling

5.9
59%
9 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings

Central monitoring

6.8
68%
11 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings

Logging

8.0
80%
10 Ratings
8.0
80%
1 Rating

Alerts and notifications

6.8
68%
11 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings

Analysis and visualization

8.9
89%
10 Ratings
8.0
80%
1 Rating

Application integration

5.9
59%
10 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings

Attribute Ratings

  • CA Scheduler Job Management is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

Likelihood to Recommend

6.8

ActiveBatch Workload Automation

68%
11 Ratings
7.0

CA Scheduler Job Management

70%
1 Rating

Usability

8.1

ActiveBatch Workload Automation

81%
3 Ratings

CA Scheduler Job Management

N/A
0 Ratings

Support Rating

4.0

ActiveBatch Workload Automation

40%
2 Ratings

CA Scheduler Job Management

N/A
0 Ratings

Likelihood to Recommend

Redwood Software

I can only speak for our environment, but it has allowed us to get away from the unfriendly Informatica PowerCenter workflow schedule. And coordination of Informatica/Tableau/ICEDQ has been a BIG help to us. We have not tried to drill down to the Informatica session-level of detail, just stayed with running workflows. The session-level logic seemed complicated.
Read full review

Broadcom

Job scheduling software for the IBM Mainframe is quite mature and most IBM Mainframe sites would already have one installed. It would appear to be very little reason to change from one scheduling package to another. If you were looking for a new scheduling package, CA Technologies is more likely to steer you towards their other product
Read full review

Pros

Redwood Software

  • File management - moving, archiving, and folder cleanup are a drag-and-drop breeze. The visual representation of file management steps includes date/time filtering, file/folder/both specification, and recursion all in an easy and intuitive unit.
  • FTP/SFTP/FTPS - while one must still write the FTP scripts, the interface simplifies much of the infrastructure, allowing the developer to encapsulate the script text in a graphical package that is easy and intuitive.
  • PowerShell integration - for anything that isn't easy in ActiveBatch's GUI, simply drop in a PowerShell step and write the task in PoSh - anything returned from PoSh can then be used by the following steps.
Read full review

Broadcom

  • Good reporting on completed schedules and jobs including highest return code of jobs.
  • ISPF interface can cope with non-standard screen sizes.
  • Easy to use ISPF interface
Read full review

Cons

Redwood Software

  • While I like being able to reuse scheduling objects and the like, more work needs to be done to help one not reinvent the same scheduling object without realizing it and to then find scheduling objects that have similar schedules even if they are worded slightly differently than what I'm expecting. It needs to be "smarter". It was easy to accumulate a pool of scheduling objects that while named differently, had exactly the same schedule. It was also hard to sift through to find the little differences between similarly named scheduling objects.
  • The logger had a clean enough interface but it could be more legible and offer contextual help to describe the messages one is reading. I remember trying to read black text on a medium gray background with Courier size 10-11 font. Not so easy to read quickly and to parse through the relevant parts. I think some selective color coding would be good and links to message definitions or any form of further information would be nice. Maybe the ability to export the log file to various formats would also be helpful.
  • I don't remember a dashboard that at a glance on the top level would highlight what jobs failed completely and which jobs might have warnings or non-critical errors. I got emails because I defined to get them. Maybe again if there was a way to color-code the type of error would be good nice-to-have.
Read full review

Broadcom

  • Monitoring interface could make better use of screen colours
Read full review

Pricing Details

ActiveBatch Workload Automation

Starting Price

Editions & Modules

ActiveBatch Workload Automation editions and modules pricing
EditionModules

Footnotes

    Offerings

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services

    Entry-level set up fee?

    Optional

    Additional Details

    CA Scheduler Job Management

    Starting Price

    Editions & Modules

    CA Scheduler Job Management editions and modules pricing
    EditionModules

    Footnotes

      Offerings

      Free Trial
      Free/Freemium Version
      Premium Consulting/Integration Services

      Entry-level set up fee?

      No setup fee

      Additional Details

      Usability

      Redwood Software

      ActiveBatch's usability is where it shines. It is pretty straight-forward to learn and administer. Our engineers like it because you can use a GUI to manage it or leverage the command line & api's. You can also create templates or clone existing "jobs" so you don't have to recreate the wheel. It is easy to chain jobs together to make them run in a specific sequence as well.
      Read full review

      Broadcom

      No answers on this topic

      Support Rating

      Redwood Software

      We have been pretty happy with ActiveBatch support so far. Luckily, we have not had any major issues with it - so we haven't logged a lot of support tickets. The response time to tickets is about average and the level of expertise of the support engineers seems about average as well. Our sales team has been helpful in getting faster responses when necessary as well.
      Read full review

      Broadcom

      No answers on this topic

      Alternatives Considered

      Redwood Software

      We looked at several other workload automation solutions and hands down we all looked at each other after seeing the demo and we all understood the genius of the application. To be honest we were all stunned and talked about it for weeks afterward. It didn't even compare to the other platforms we had demos of. We knew instinctively that this was the one.
      Read full review

      Broadcom

      All quite similar and as CA Scheduler had the smallest foot print across the agencies we support it is being decommmissioned
      Read full review

      Return on Investment

      Redwood Software

      • ActiveBatch [Workload Automation] has increased our nightly processing stability exponentially. Our prior automation software was unreliable and often failed without explanation. Since moving to ActiveBatch [Workload Automation] we have had incredible stability, and any nightly processing errors that happen now are attributed to a cause other than automation. It's the most reliable software we currently use at our company.
      Read full review

      Broadcom

      • Being decommissioned due to software rationalisation.
      Read full review

      Add comparison