ActiveFlip vs. inriver PIM

inriver PIM is well suited for growing companies that might have multiple brands, categories, languages and a complicated data model. inriver PIM is more than a syndication service, which is important to differentiate from other so-called PIM providers. I specifically like the ability for ecosystem collaboration across multiple technology platforms. However, inriver, is a complicated system and requires an implementation partner, which could price it out of the range for some companies.

Incentivized

• Scalability
• Data Integrations
• Workflow

Incentivized

• Missing the ability to be able to right click an item/product to open in a new tab
• Mass Asset/SKU management is not an out-of-the-box feature
• Shared folders area - few options to create a specialized area that you can block other users from deleting

Incentivized

inRiver has been both helpful and responsive to our needs. Their customer service and ticketing system are top-notch - timely communications and followup

Incentivized

It's really easy to use. There are no confusion on the user experience and the interface, very straight forward. If you want to change environments it's a simple dropdown. If you want to publish or put an item to draft it's just a simple click of a button of the family/item's status

Incentivized

Our previous systmes are the brandmaker PIM and DAM. I have used it for quite a while and the advantages on a technical architecture perspective is that importing of products from Brandmaker it needs to go first on a SFTP server before it goes on our website and that brings us more maintenance work

Incentivized

• Quicker go-to-market
• Improved templates for customer data
• Scalable for our growing organization

Incentivized