Adaface vs. DIBELS Next

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Adaface
Score 6.5 out of 10
N/A
Adaface is an online assessment platform from the company of the same name in SIngapore, featuring tests for pre-employment screening and technical skills assessment.
$180
per year
DIBELS Next
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
DIBELS Next are short (one minute) fluency measures that can be used for universal screening, benchmark assessment, and progress monitoring in Kindergarten - 6th grade, and are developed and maintained by the University of Oregon's Center on Teaching & Learning.N/A
Pricing
AdafaceDIBELS Next
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AdafaceDIBELS Next
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
AdafaceDIBELS Next
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AdafaceDIBELS Next
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
AdafaceDIBELS Next
Likelihood to Recommend
Adaface
It simply helps us internally and externally. By externally, I mean we usually do a quick round of initial testing using Adaface, and internally, I mean we are planning to use it as skills assessment tool for our purpose.I am not sure if there is any control over the googlability of questions. Unfortunately, I cannot edit some questions, whose test is not super clear and I would like to correct it. Many candidates say that the test is anxiety-provoking
Read full review
University of Oregon
More intense face-to-face training would be beneficial. The students can utilize their accounts easily. I like the assessment three times per year & my access to see if a student has gained, and if not, then reasoning is given. Some of the reports are hard for families to follow and understand. Honestly, I preferred the computer interface from the past years as opposed to the current system.
Read full review
Pros
Adaface
  • Addressing challenges in the recruitment process
  • Technical assessments on coding and other technical languages with ease
  • Streamlining the process of assessing candidates' skills
Read full review
University of Oregon
  • On-going Reading/Phonics/Dyslexia Screening
  • Monthly Progress Monitoring
  • Easy for the students to use on their end
Read full review
Cons
Adaface
  • Sometimes questions are not elaborated or don't have sufficient material to grasp them properly, due to which candidates cannot understand them properly.
  • There should be the option of providing hints as sometimes, we as recruiters, may require such features to judge a person on a few other factors as well.
Read full review
University of Oregon
  • Presentation of the “how to”- I miss the older days of meeting for a week and learning the product inside & out.
  • More user-friendly format for those giving assessments-difficult to use the home page & areas within.
  • Parents/guardians have a difficult time with some of the written items, their lack of understanding.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Adaface
No answers on this topic
University of Oregon
Both provide BOY, MOY, & EOY Assessments. We Progress Monitor with both, but Renaissance is much easier for the students to use themselves. My students never complain about DIBELS Next testing (they like to see if they “move up.”) However, Renaissance is a product I have used successfully for many more years, and the ease of use is ideal when in a busy classroom.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Adaface
  • Has simplified our hiring process significantly, making for less expenditure during onboarding and interviewing
Read full review
University of Oregon
  • I’m not with the monetary element, but I would think our school has benefitted from this investment.
Read full review
ScreenShots