I'd land at 8.5/10 overall, please, or a B/B+. Based on the prior question where I can spot 4/four potentialities for ongoing improvement, yet I came up with more 'you're doing this well/very well', the grade/ranking is earned. It's great in situations were: An organization is creating/promoting MANY events, like we do. There are VARIOUS/VARIED types of events, esp cadence. Not everyone is using (thanktully) the exact same calendaring apps/sites ( a mix, of O365 and G-Workspace, et al. )
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I think it's appropriate for everyone that meets with customers, meets with people within their businesses. I even put my personal calendar on my work calendar. I'm just looking at it every day, so I think everyone could use it.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Enables users to set their "working hours" and others can see if they are setting up a meetings a moon symbol next to their name to show it is outside of that invitees working hours
Allows you to easily create scheduled tasks directly on your Google Calendar
The booking page is really helpful for external people who want to chat with me, but so few people use it, that it makes it more frustrating. The solution exists but nobody is using it. It needs to be highlighted more
You have to switch between email accounts or set up additional calendars to schedule work events vs personal events
integrations with other calendars don't update quickly, so sometimes a coworkers vacation doesn't show up in the calendar until much later
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
"The next logical step" was easy to understand. Everything was simple and straightforward. I appreciate how there wasn't a bunch of extra capabilities -- the ux was very focused on the main problem it was solving. I signed up and created the first event in minutes without reading any help docs or needing any extra training.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The platform itself is pretty user friendly even if you don't have a technical background. You can easily schedule meetings, block out focus time, update your time off, and add meeting notes. The settings are easily mapped out in terms of functionality and if you need help you can easily search for an answer on Google search
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The only two/2 which I can point to autentically are the two primarily calendaring options ( GWorkspace/Calendar; O365/MS Calendar ). We were ever so briefly -- less than a 1/2 mos -- considering some research in mid 2024 on add't alternatives, yet that open discussion didn't take hold. AddEvent was already the default for ~1y (if not a bit longer) by then, so it had to be knocked aside by something quite good, and we never got to the deeper analysis part.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Most of the other services we would use don't have the same integration with other Google services that Google Calendar has. The ability to view and set things from your email is very convenient. So is the ability to have your notifications automatically show up on an Android phone as a reminder.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
