Adeptia Connect vs. Mule ESB

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Adeptia Connect
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Adeptia in Chicago offers their B2B integration solution to enables enterprises to accelerate customer data onboarding from months to a matter of minutes. Adeptia Connect provides a simple user interface (a front-end) to manage all external connections and data interfaces for a company. It provides self-service partner on boarding and no-code approach that enables business users from a company and its partners to view, setup and manage data connections with each other.N/A
Mule ESB
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Mule ESB, from Mulesoft, is an open source middleware solution.N/A
Pricing
Adeptia ConnectMule ESB
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adeptia ConnectMule ESB
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
Adeptia ConnectMule ESB
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 8.1 out of 10
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises
TIBCO B2B Integration Solution
TIBCO B2B Integration Solution
Score 8.0 out of 10
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Adeptia ConnectMule ESB
Likelihood to Recommend
9.3
(3 ratings)
9.8
(5 ratings)
User Testimonials
Adeptia ConnectMule ESB
Likelihood to Recommend
Adeptia
I recommend the program for an advanced stage, it is not a program for small companies, it is a program for medium or large companies where you know about data and its flow in which you need to make the leap to a 3.0 level of the same.I could immediately recommend it to colleagues for its great storage capacity and agile control.
Read full review
Salesforce
If you’re bringing anything into Salesforce you should just invest now into Mule, you will get your money’s worth and find a myriad of uses to build APIs between many other systems. Once you build a component you can easily reuse it as a building block to attach to another source/destination. This makes it easy to ramp up quickly and spread usage of Mule throughout your enterprise. A good value for medium to large companies, but probably cheaper to outsource your job to a consulting firm if you are smaller.
Read full review
Pros
Adeptia
  • End users can set up pipelines within Gap to connect without having to use professional services.
  • Users can simply select a particular template.
  • Let's say that data integration calculates and configures a data flow very easily.
Read full review
Salesforce
  • It is best suited for Rest API development. Mule ESB uses RAML as an API descriptor which is less complex and easy to understand. RAML is an open standard majorly supported by Mulesoft. Once RAML is developed, it is very easy (a few clicks)to create flows corresponding to the resources defined in the RAML. One can also include JSON schema validation in RAML, and with the use of APIkit router, Mule ESB makes the request validation very easy (it's automatic basically.)
  • Mule ESB comes with a large spectrum of community and enterprise connectors. We have connectors for all the major platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Salesforce, SAP, etc. This enables Mule ESB to integrate with the other systems in a faster and more robust way. Mule ESB has many components to fulfill the requirements of each integration (for example batch processing, parallel processing, choice, etc.)
  • Mule API gateway is one of the best tools (modules) of Mulesoft's offering. It supports API governance and management very well. One can easily enforce policies on their APIs with API gateway. It enables some of the must-have features in an API solution (i.e. throttling, oAuth, access levels, etc.)
  • Implementing a CI/CD (DevOps) environment for Mule ESB is a very easy task. Mule majorly uses MAVEN as its build tool, which in turn makes it best suitable for CI/CD approach. Mule also provides MAVEN plugins for auto deployments to the servers. Mule also has a best Unit testing module which is MUnit. MUnit can be used for both Unit and Functional testing, and it is easy to write and generates coverage reports in various formats.
Read full review
Cons
Adeptia
  • Support only in english and not always reactive.
Read full review
Salesforce
  • Make sure to not over-engineer shared components. It can complicate development
  • Create a roadmap for where you are going - if not, you may miss components
  • I suggest getting support, otherwise it could be a difficult learning curve
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Adeptia
We mainly choose Adeptia Connect for the friendly UI. From the first minutes, it was really easy to use and understand how it works and then manages complex connections.
Read full review
Salesforce
It doesn't have API . We have to go for another API manager. But in Mule, it has both API manager and ESB
Read full review
Return on Investment
Adeptia
  • The user can set up the whole template and then enter the data or we simply have to connect that data by making use of connections from an account through an API.
  • We can do reference lookups in the database to further enhance it before sending it to the data link and as part of this process flow
  • We can attach by taking up a little bit of time or batch and this can be a multi-directional process. So I needed this data transformation
Read full review
Salesforce
  • Overall a great tool for complex integrations
Read full review
ScreenShots