Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Agile Hive
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
The world of work is constantly changing. Agile work processes in particular are becoming increasingly popular. Even large companies are trying to introduce agile working methods. For many, the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) is the right solution for their agile teams. However, implementing SAFe with all its features such as providing reports, visualizing dependencies and automated documentation is not always easy in reality. Many companies spend a lot of time and money searching for the right…N/A
Aurea Process
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Aurea Process (formerly CX Process) from Aurea Software in Austin is a business process management offering, based on Savvion BPM.
$200,000
per year
Digital.ai TeamForge
Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Digital.ai (formerly CollabNet) aims to help enterprises and government organizations deliver high-quality software at speed with TeamForge, its application lifecycle management suite. According to the vendor, Digital.ai offers innovative solutions, provides consulting and Agile training services, supports more than 10,000 customers with 6 million users in 100 countries, and has been recognized for 13 consecutive years as SD Times 100 “Best in Show” winner in the…N/A
Pricing
Agile HiveAurea ProcessDigital.ai TeamForge
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
License
$200,000
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Agile HiveAurea ProcessDigital.ai TeamForge
Free Trial
NoNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Agile HiveAurea ProcessDigital.ai TeamForge
Features
Agile HiveAurea ProcessDigital.ai TeamForge
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Agile Hive
7.8
1 Ratings
4% above category average
Aurea Process
-
Ratings
Digital.ai TeamForge
-
Ratings
Task Management7.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts7.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools8.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
Agile Hive
10.0
1 Ratings
24% above category average
Aurea Process
-
Ratings
Digital.ai TeamForge
-
Ratings
Velocity Calculation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Agile Hive
-
Ratings
Aurea Process
5.3
1 Ratings
38% below category average
Digital.ai TeamForge
-
Ratings
Dashboards00 Ratings6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Agile Hive
-
Ratings
Aurea Process
5.8
1 Ratings
36% below category average
Digital.ai TeamForge
-
Ratings
Process designer00 Ratings6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Process simulation00 Ratings7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Business rules engine00 Ratings5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
SOA support00 Ratings5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Process player00 Ratings7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Model execution00 Ratings5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Agile Hive
-
Ratings
Aurea Process
4.0
1 Ratings
70% below category average
Digital.ai TeamForge
-
Ratings
Social collaboration tools00 Ratings4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
Agile Hive
-
Ratings
Aurea Process
4.0
1 Ratings
68% below category average
Digital.ai TeamForge
-
Ratings
Content management00 Ratings4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Agile HiveAurea ProcessDigital.ai TeamForge
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 8.4 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 8.4 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.3 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Agile HiveAurea ProcessDigital.ai TeamForge
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(4 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Agile HiveAurea ProcessDigital.ai TeamForge
Likelihood to Recommend
Seibert Group GmbH
Agile Hive is used for our value train
within a SAFe setup. Every quarter we organize a so-called Product Increment
(PI) Planning, where we plan all Features and Enablers in Agile Hive.
Based on the priority of the Product Manager all teams plan their Features and
Enablers accordingly to the sprints that are determined by the Release Train
Engineer and set up in Agile Hive. The teams then create User Stories and
estimate them and based on their sprint velocity (defined in Agile Hive)
Product Owners can see how many Features and Enablers are realistic in one
quarter (Product Increment). Further, dependencies across teams can be defined
and made visible in Agile Hive, so that the plan is feasible. Without Agile
Hive it would be hard or impossible to plan across several teams within a value
train and to manage all dependencies. Additionally, with Agile Hive the plan is
more realistic, so what can be achieved within one quarter in product
development.
Read full review
Aurea
The tool has potential. Its capabilities and visual aspects could be considered rather basic but this might improve, particularly if the business intelligence/analytics aspect is leveraged. Once running well, it could allow (perhaps smaller) companies to successfully improve their customers' experiences through digitalizing customer journey - and we all know that customer loyalty goes a long way. However, whether or not the tool is comprehensive enough to deliver this for larger companies with more complex, multi- and omni-channel interactions is yet to be seen...
Read full review
Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
CollabNet TeamForge is more well-suited for technically knowledgeable users such as developers, systems analysts, QA but not for non-technical users due to the technical data used throughout the tool. CollabNet TeamForge is appropriate for most applications development. In any industry especially suited for high demand software delivery environments.
Read full review
Pros
Seibert Group GmbH
  • Roadmapping in terms of defining epics and planning them across a timeline and across teams.
  • Showing dependencies within teams and across teams and over time horizon.
  • Create transparency throughout the product organization and teams about what is planned.
Read full review
Aurea
  • Face-lifted platforms: CX Messenger (formerly Sonic), CX Monitor (formerly Actional), CX Process (formerly Savvion)
  • User-friendly UI
  • Relatively painless implementation
Read full review
Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
  • Code security.
  • Code migration.
  • Agile tie-in.
Read full review
Cons
Seibert Group GmbH
  • I believe the training and support could be more hands on and easier.
  • The Agile Hive - SAFe in Jira product can be a bit robust to understand.
  • Having Knowledge transfer videos can help more than documentations.
Read full review
Aurea
  • Standard edition is significantly lighter touch than the (pricier) Enterprise version
  • There are similar solutions on the market that are competitively prices and offer positive user experience
  • Data migration can be tricky at times
Read full review
Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
  • I would like to see personalization for managing artifacts, that is, allowing the user to customize pages and save personalized settings and then save them as bookmarks.
  • I would like an improved subversion browser such as a graphical user interface rather than a basic file explorer.
  • I would like built in features for CollabNet TeamForge integrated with subversion so that i can associate my private code branches and code changes.
Read full review
Usability
Seibert Group GmbH
It has in general a good usability, but there are some downsides, the big picture view of the entire product increment is too static, so there is no zoom in or zoom out. Mostly throughout planning it is necessary to zoom in to a sprint level and manage the user stories there. Also, the pig picture view has some limitations, because you cannot read the entire user story name (boxes are too small).
Read full review
Aurea
No answers on this topic
Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Seibert Group GmbH
No answers on this topic
Aurea
No answers on this topic
Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
They always answer the phone when we put a call in, any time. They have consistently sent out contractors when needed and were there every step of the way when we switched over from ClearCase to TeamForge years ago. The support is what you really pay for when you buy into TeamForge.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Seibert Group GmbH
With Jira Software alone it is also possible to plan a SAFe product increment planning, but it would be nearly impossible to see the overall big picture of all product teams involved in a release train. So, the planning on sprint level for one team would be more efficient, but the planning for a whole quarter with all dependencies across teams would be not feasible to present. Therefore, Agile SAFe enables value trains an efficient way to plan a product increment.
Read full review
Aurea
No answers on this topic
Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
CollabNet TeamForge is superior to Mercury mainly because it has a subversion change management tool integrated with the product. CollabNet TeamForge offers more complexity but with more flexibility for managing and tracking projects. I think
CollabNet TeamForge is more comprehensive than either Mercury and JIRA. They're all user friendly tools with short learning curves but CollabNet TeamForge is most efficient in my experience.
JIRA was recently adopted for particular applications and is currently being evaluated by various technology teams.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Seibert Group GmbH
  • More transparency.
  • Better product decisions.
  • Saving time and resources.
  • Less critical dependencies.
Read full review
Aurea
  • As our customers vary in size and maturity, the ROI ranges accordingly.
  • For younger, smaller businesses this is a useful tool. Digitalization of he customer journey has certainly helped save time and efforts in many cases.
  • For more mature market players the tool is not always comprehensive enough. Dashboard and report personalization take time and efforts, and sometimes it feels that a dedicated BI tool would be a more suitable solution.
Read full review
Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
  • Unfortunately, I do not have access to ROI information.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Aurea Process Screenshots

Screenshot of CX Platform enables leading companies to modernize, automate, and monitor their back office by bridging legacy SOA solutions to modern micro-service and container-based architectures.

Digital.ai TeamForge Screenshots

Screenshot of TeamForge OverviewScreenshot of TeamForge Reporting DashboardScreenshot of Chef Deployment TraceabilityScreenshot of Defects Trend Report