AlloyDB vs. PostgreSQL
AlloyDB vs. PostgreSQL
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AlloyDB | N/A | AlloyDB for PostgreSQL from Google is a fully managed PostgreSQL-compatible database service for demanding enterprise database workloads. AlloyDB aims to combine the best of Google with one of the most popular open-source database engines, PostgreSQL, for superior performance, scale, and availability. | N/A | |
PostgreSQL | N/A | PostgreSQL (alternately Postgres) is a free and open source object-relational database system boasting over 30 years of active development, reliability, feature robustness, and performance. It supports SQL and is designed to support various workloads flexibly. | N/A |
| AlloyDB | PostgreSQL | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| AlloyDB | PostgreSQL |
|---|
| AlloyDB | PostgreSQL | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | IBM Cloudant Score 7.4 out of 10 | InfluxDB Score 9.0 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | IBM Cloudant Score 7.4 out of 10 | SQLite Score 8.0 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | IBM Cloudant Score 7.4 out of 10 | SQLite Score 8.0 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| AlloyDB | PostgreSQL | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - (0 ratings) | 8.3 (56 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (1 ratings) |
| Usability | - (0 ratings) | 8.3 (9 ratings) |
| Availability | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (1 ratings) |
| Performance | - (0 ratings) | 7.0 (1 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 9.3 (7 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (1 ratings) |
| Product Scalability | - (0 ratings) | 8.0 (1 ratings) |
| AlloyDB | PostgreSQL | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() Google No answers on this topic | PostgreSQL Global Development Group
|
| Pros | ![]() Google No answers on this topic | PostgreSQL Global Development Group
|
| Cons | ![]() Google No answers on this topic | PostgreSQL Global Development Group
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]() Google No answers on this topic | PostgreSQL Global Development Group
|
| Usability | ![]() Google No answers on this topic | PostgreSQL Global Development Group
|
| Reliability and Availability | ![]() Google No answers on this topic | PostgreSQL Global Development Group
|
| Performance | ![]() Google No answers on this topic | PostgreSQL Global Development Group
|
| Support Rating | ![]() Google No answers on this topic | PostgreSQL Global Development Group
|
| Online Training | ![]() Google No answers on this topic | PostgreSQL Global Development Group
|
| Implementation Rating | ![]() Google No answers on this topic | PostgreSQL Global Development Group
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() Google No answers on this topic | PostgreSQL Global Development Group
|
| Scalability | ![]() Google No answers on this topic | PostgreSQL Global Development Group
|
| Return on Investment | ![]() Google No answers on this topic | PostgreSQL Global Development Group
|
| ScreenShots |






